<< December 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31




Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:


rss feed

Wednesday, December 27, 2006
The Ford Pardon Revisited!

IRANIANS CAUGHT ATTACKING U.S. FORCES!, STATE DEPARTMENT ADMITS SUPPORT OF ETHIOPIA, NORTH KOREA SELLING OFF GOLD, FORGET OSAMA- THESE TWO HAVE ELUDED CAPTURE FOR 11 YEARS, THE CONTROVERSIAL FORD PARDON RE-VISITED!
 
The American military said Tuesday that it had credible evidence linking Iranians and their Iraqi associates, detained here in raids last week, to criminal activities, including attacks against American forces. Evidence also emerged that some of the detainees were involved in shipments of weapons to illegal armed groups in Iraq.

In its first official confirmation of last week’s raids, the military said it had confiscated maps, videos, photographs and documents in one of the raids on a site in Baghdad. The military confirmed the arrests of five Iranians, and said that three of them had since been released.

The Bush administration has described the two Iranians still being held late Tuesday night as senior military officials. Maj. Gen. William Caldwell IV, the chief spokesman for the American command, said that the military, in the raid, had “gathered specific intelligence from highly credible sources that linked individuals and locations with criminal activities against Iraqi civilians, security forces and coalition force personnel.”

General Caldwell made his remarks by e-mail in response to a query about the raids, first reported Monday in The New York Times. “Some of that specific intelligence,” he said via e-mail, “dealt explicitly with force-protection issues, including attacks on MNF-I forces.”

MNF-I stands for Multinational Force-Iraq, the official name of the American-led foreign forces there.

American officials have long said that the Iranian government interferes in Iraq, but the arrests, in the compound of one of Iraq’s most powerful Shiite political leaders, were the first since the American invasion in which officials were offering evidence of the link.

The raids threaten to upset the delicate balance of the three-way relationship between the United States, Iran and Iraq. The Iraqi government has made extensive efforts to engage Iran in security matters in recent months, and the arrests of the Iranians could scuttle those efforts.

http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/sf/nyt12_27_6_1.htm

The first pardon President Ford did created controversy- the pardoning of Richard Nixon. Today that is seen by historians as part of a healing process. But his last pardon he did leaving office outraged veterans of World War 2 at the time. Today her nickname is used by "everyone who knows" as a symbol of treason. But like other facts "everyone knows"- that Joe McCarthy was wrong, that Lincoln was a defender of Constitutional rights, upon examination- the "facts" fall apart.

THE CONTROVERSIAL FORD PARDON

Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino - accused Tokyo Rose - used Orphan Ann as broadcasting pseudonym. 

Iva Toguri was an American stranded in Japan at the outbreak of World War II. She was forced to broadcast propaganda to the Allied troops for Japan. In these radio programs, she taunted the troops and played music from home. She took the name Orphan Ann on the program, Zero Hour.

"Tokyo Rose" is a myth: Iva Toguri, like other women who also broadcast Japanese propaganda to Allied troops, was never referred to as Rose or Tokyo Rose. It was a name given by the Allies to the various female Japanese broadcasters. But it has been used since the war primarily to refer to Iva Toguri D'Aquino.

After the war, Iva Toguri was convicted of treason and imprisoned, released early for good behavior. She maintained her innocence, asserting that she had not said the words used to convict her, and that she had remained a loyal American. Though forced to broadcast to the troops, she claimed that she, with the help of American POWs assigned to the radio broadcasts, made herself and her words purposefully ridiculous. She had refused to give up her American citizenship, despite pressure and even punishment from the Japanese who forced her into the broadcasting role.

In the 1970s a public campaign brought to light the testimony of the POWs who worked with her and supported her story. The testimony of the witnesses against her was questioned, and some admitted lying. Eventually (1977) she was pardoned by President Gerald Ford, and early in 2006, the same year she died, she was given the Edward J. Herlihy Citizenship Award by the World War II Veterans Committee.

After her imprisonment she returned to Chicago where her family owned a store. She continued to work at the store nearly until her death.

http://womenshistory.about.com/library/bio/blbio_toguri_iva.htm

Iva Toguri has lived a long time, but she said the "most memorable" day of her life came earlier this year when she was recognized by a group of U.S. military veterans.
    The Chicago ceremony was rich with irony. The Edward J. Herlihy Citizenship Award, which the World War II Veterans Committee bestowed on 89-year-old Ms. Toguri at a January luncheon in Chicago, was named for a famous broadcaster whose narration of the Universal newsreels won him the moniker "The Voice of World War II."
    Ms. Toguri was also a broadcaster -- once notoriously known as Tokyo Rose.
    The January award was an important vindication of Ms. Toguri, who was sent to federal prison after being convicted of treason based on perjured testimony. Her American citizenship was stripped in 1949. President Ford restored it in 1977.
    The irony-filled saga of this woman born on the Fourth of July -- in Los Angeles in 1916 -- is the kind of amazing story that sounds like a Hollywood script. Indeed, Paramount has a film of Ms. Toguri's life in the works, to be produced by Frank Darabont, best known for such films as "The Shawshank Redemption" and "The Green Mile."
    The child of Japanese-American parents, Ms. Toguri grew up in a middle-class family determined to assimilate into the American mainstream. Ms. Toguri, who spoke almost no Japanese and hated Japanese food, was a Girl Scout, a Methodist and a Republican. She loved pop culture ("Orphan Annie" was her favorite cartoon character) and graduated from the University of California at Los Angeles, with plans to become a doctor.
    Then, in June 1941, a letter arrived from her aunt, who had remained in Japan and was in failing health. She begged Ms. Toguri's mother to come to Japan for one last visit.
    Ms. Toguri's mother also was in poor health, however. Her father and brother were busy running the family business, and so Ms. Toguri was sent instead, boarding a ship for what she expected would be a six-month visit to Tokyo.
    Then came the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the United States into World War II. Ms. Toguri found herself trapped in the capital of the Japanese empire, 7,000 miles from her American home.
    Unlike some Japanese-Americans who found themselves stuck in wartime Japan under similar circumstances, Ms. Toguri resisted official pressure to renounce her U.S. citizenship.
    Ms. Toguri found work as a typist at the Domei News Agency and at the Danish Embassy and, in 1943, responded to an ad from Radio Tokyo for English-speaking typists. At about the same time, Japanese military authorities decided to step up their radio propaganda broadcasts by bringing in three Allied prisoners of war -- Australian Maj. Charles Cousens, American Capt. Wallace Ince and Philippine Lt. Norman Reyes -- to run a new daily show called the "Zero Hour."
    Maj. Cousens resolved to use the "Zero Hour" to entertain, rather than demoralize, the U.S. troops who were targets of the broadcast and, arguing that the shows would be more persuasive if presented with an authentic Western touch, talked his Japanese captors into granting him control of the program.

http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.washingtontimes.com/culture/20060529%2D115535%2D6055r.htm 

Former U.S. President Gerald Ford, who was swept into office after the Watergate scandal and later pardoned Richard Nixon, died at age 93, his widow said on Tuesday.

"My family joins me in sharing the difficult news that Gerald Ford, our beloved husband, father, grandfather and great-grandfather, has passed away at 93 years of age," Betty Ford said in a statement.

"His life was filled with love of God, his family and his country."

A former Republican congressman, Ford took office vowing, "Our long national nightmare is over." He served for 2 1/2 years with a style often mocked as bumbling until he lost the 1976 U.S. presidential election to Democrat Jimmy Carter.

Ford, the oldest living U.S. president, had been ailing and largely out of the public eye for several years.

He was the only U.S. president who was not elected to either the presidency or vice presidency. He was appointed vice president in 1973 after Nixon's vice president, Spiro Agnew, resigned to avoid prosecution on corruption charges.

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=newsone&storyID=2006-12-27T091801Z_01_N26411374_RTRUKOC_0_US-FORD.xml&WTmodLoc=IntNewsHome_R1_newsone-1

The State Department signaled support Tuesday for Ethiopian military operations against Somalia, noting that Ethiopia has had "genuine security concerns" stemming from the rise of Islamist forces in its eastern neighbor.

Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos also said that the Ethiopian military acted at the request of Somalia's internationally backed secular government, which has been resisting with little success the spreading influence of the more powerful Islamist forces.

Gallegos noted that Ethiopia has said that its action is intended to prevent further aggression by the Islamic Courts militias.

Ethiopia's Christian-led government has received counter-terrorism assistance from the United States. It includes military training for aviation security, police training and border and coastal security, the Pentagon said.

The Bush administration has been increasingly alarmed by the growing strength of the militias and the welcome they reportedly have given to al-Qaida militants.

The Islamic militants operate under the umbrella of the Council of Islamic Courts.

The government has no presence in Somalia's capital, Mogadishu, its reach limited to the western town of Baidoa. In contrast, the CIC has dominated the country's entire southern region.

A priority U.S. goal in Somalia is the capture of three reputed al-Qaida militants wanted for the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 and a hotel in Kenya in 2002. The three are from Sudan, Kenya and the Comoros Islands, located off Africa's east coast.

Al-Qaida militants are operating with "great comfort" in Somalia, Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer said recently.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2006/12/26/national/w130749S85.DTL&type=printable

 

In three current high-profile criminal cases, federal prosecutors have asked that the identities of Israeli government witnesses be withheld from defendants and their attorneys — a move some legal scholars see as a highly unusual end run around the 6th Amendment.

Defense attorneys in all three cases have argued, with mixed results, that allowing U.S. prosecutors to keep the witnesses' identities secret — as demanded by Israel to protect its agents — violates their clients' constitutional right to confront their accusers.

Though courts have allowed witnesses to testify in secured courtrooms or found other ways to protect their identities when they might be in danger, experts say it is extraordinary to keep the identities secret even from defense attorneys.

"It absolutely gives me pause," said Jeffrey L. Fisher, a Stanford University law professor and 6th Amendment expert. "The essence of cross-examination is often being able to do a background investigation on the witness and use that as a lever for questioning their testimony. And if you take that away from a defendant, he is not left with very much."

Fisher added, "I can safely say the Supreme Court has never had a case about testifying under a pseudonym."

In Chicago, a federal judge recently permitted two Israeli agents to testify anonymously against two men accused of aiding the Palestinian group Hamas, designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization since 1995. Judge Amy J. St. Eve said that the right to learn a witness' identity was "not absolute" and that the use of pseudonyms for the Israeli agents was justified because of their assignments.

"Given the safety issues inherent in revealing the [Israeli] agents' true identities, the government has met its burden that it need not disclose this identifying information," St. Eve said.

In Miami, however, a federal judge rejected a government request that six Israeli undercover police officers testify in disguises and without revealing their identities against a man awaiting trial on charges of trafficking in the drug Ecstasy.

http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/latimes677.html

 

Life at the Ramadi Outpost picture story:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/galleries/061223/ramadi/index.html

 

The armed forces, already struggling to meet recruiting goals, are considering expanding the number of noncitizens in the ranks - including disputed proposals to open recruiting stations overseas and putting more immigrants on a faster track to US citizenship if they volunteer - according to Pentagon officials.

    Foreign citizens serving in the US military is a highly charged issue, which could expose the Pentagon to criticism that it is essentially using mercenaries to defend the country. Other analysts voice concern that a large contingent of noncitizens under arms could jeopardize national security or reflect badly on Americans' willingness to serve in uniform.

    The idea of signing up foreigners who are seeking US citizenship is gaining traction as a way to address a critical need for the Pentagon, while fully absorbing some of the roughly one million immigrants that enter the United States legally each year.

    The proposal to induct more noncitizens, which is still largely on the drawing board, has to clear a number of hurdles. So far, the Pentagon has been quiet about specifics - including who would be eligible to join, where the recruiting stations would be, and what the minimum standards might involve, including English proficiency. In the meantime, the Pentagon and immigration authorities have expanded a program that accelerates citizenship for legal residents who volunteer for the military.

    And since Sept. 11, 2001, the number of immigrants in uniform who have become US citizens has increased from 750 in 2001 to almost 4,600 last year, according to military statistics. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/122606A.shtml

 

The number of military service women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan has reached 70, more than the total from the Korean, Vietnam and Desert Storm wars.
    "Some have argued that the women who have died are no different than the men," according to a report noting the 70 casualties from the Center for Military Readiness, which opposes women in combat. "But deliberate exposure of women to combat violence in war is tantamount to acceptance of violence against women in general."
    The reasons for the historical high casualty rate are multiple. Women now make up more than 14 percent of the volunteer force, performing a long list of military occupational specialties they did not do 50 years ago. Women in earlier wars were mostly confined to medical teams. Today, they fly combat aircraft, drive trucks to resupply fighting units, go on patrol as military police (MPs) and repair equipment.
    What's more, the Afghan and Iraq conflicts are lasting longer than the relatively brief Desert Storm, which featured the first large contribution of American women in a war zone.
    But the real difference in Afghanistan and Iraq is the battlefield. It is virtually every road, neighborhood and rural village. Insurgents do not just attack front-line combat troops. Suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) strike at any time, meaning that women in support units can be just as vulnerable as men in ground combat.
    "What it means is, it's just unprecedented," said Elaine Donnelly, who heads the Center for Military Readiness. "It is something that people are not aware of, for the most part. Some of these stories are incredibly sad."  http://washtimes.com/national/20061225-110520-6688r.htm

 

North Korea, desperate for foreign currency under harsh US-imposed sanctions, has started to sell its gold reserves on the international markets, Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper reported yesterday.

The US last year blacklisted a Pyongyang-linked bank in Macau, infuriating the communist regime, which then boycotted six-nation disarmament talks for 13 months, during which it tested an atom bomb.

Since the US crackdown on the bank, North Korea has earned $US28 million in foreign cash by exporting gold to Thailand, which had not imported gold from Pyongyang for the previous five years, the newspaper reported.

The US blacklisted Macau's Banco Delta Asia in September last year, saying it suspected $US24 million ($30.6 million) in North Korean bank accounts was linked to counterfeiting or money-laundering. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,20977194,00.html

 

After 11 years, the hunt for Radovan Karadzic and Gen. Ratko Mladic may well be the most frustrating, infuriating and fruitless around.

The two, wanted for the most heinous crimes of Bosnia’s bloody civil war from 1992 to 1995, have managed to elude thousands of Western peacekeepers and local police forces with what is widely suspected to be the collusion of the Serbian military. Reality and myth have grown indistinguishable as stories have emerged of their possible hide-outs and of the failed attempts to track them down.

Now, for the first time, clear — even mundane — details of how General Mladic has managed to dodge arrest are emerging bit by bit in a Belgrade courtroom.

Until January this year, the general, the former commander of the Bosnian Serb Army, was living in the Serbian capital protected by a network of former comrades in arms, according to testimony given during the trial of 11 people accused of helping to hide him.

Evidence at the trial describes an urban odyssey that started out with the general hiding in Belgrade’s best known army barracks with the full knowledge of the army hierarchy, and then shows him being whisked away in a Yugo by bodyguards to a private apartment.

For a period of three and half years, the onetime Yugoslav Army officer — who is still regarded as a hero by many Serbs but is vehemently despised by the Bosnian Muslims he victimized — moved between six different addresses. He used some for a matter of days and others for months, before finally holing up in a Communist-era monolith for over two years. There, prosecutors say, he was provided with a housekeeper, and groceries and phone cards were brought to his door.

Throughout, he seemed to have the protection of the army and state officials. At one point, he was offered plastic surgery and a false passport to help him flee the country, something he appears to have declined. To this day, he still eludes arrest.  http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/sf/nyt12_26_6_1.htm


 

Posted at 03:42 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Tuesday, December 26, 2006
Saddam: Dead Man Walking!

FRANCE IN COLLAPSE, ANGRY ISRAEL BREAKS PROMISE TO U.S., CATHOLICS QUITTING NORTHERN IRELAND POLICE FORCE, NIGERIANS SCAMMING U.S. IRISH, 1000 DEAD ISLAMISTS IN SOMALIA- ETHIOPIA WAR!
 
Iraq's highest court rejected Saddam Hussein's appeal Tuesday and said the former dictator must be hanged within 30 days for ordering the killing of scores of Shiite Muslims in 1982.

The sentence has already stoked Iraq's sectarian rage, with the Shiite majority demanding Saddam's death and his fellow Sunni Arabs calling the trial tainted.

"From tomorrow, any day could be the day" Saddam is sent to the gallows, the chief judge said. Saddam was condemned to death for his role in the execution of 148 Shiite Muslims from the small northern town of Dujail, after a 1982 assassination attempt.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061227/D8M8RSR80.html

 

Israel has approved a new settlement in the West Bank to house former Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip, officials said Tuesday, breaking a promise to the U.S. to halt home construction in the Palestinian territories.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6304475,00.html

 

Somalia's Islamists are in full retreat after Ethiopian airstrikes and a ground offensive that have killed up to 1,000 of the religious movement's fighters, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi said on Tuesday.

"A joint Somali government and Ethiopian force has broken the back of the international terrorist forces… These forces are in full retreat," Meles told reporters in Addis Ababa, adding that up to 1,000 Islamist fighters had been killed.

"A few are Somali but the majority are foreigners," he said of the dead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2751428

 

More than 70 Catholic recruits have quit the Northern Ireland Police Service, it was revealed today.

Even though representation from the Catholic community has increased since the introduction of the new policing arrangements, all sorts of pressures have been blamed for numbers dropping out.

These include domestic and work difficulties and republican paramilitary threats.

"One of the main reasons for people leaving was cited as personal reasons, as was individuals failing to meet standards required," a police spokeswoman said.

"Family and work life was also a factor and this includes people coming under pressure from family and indeed societal pressure to leave.

"Unfortunately a small number of student officers have been advised about their personal security and for some this has resulted in them deciding to leave the organisation."

Sinn Féin is considering joining the Policing Board oversight committee but Catholic members of scrutiny structures have been threatened by dissident republicans.
http://www.eecho.ie/news/bstory.asp?j=181133512&p=y8yy34y35&n=181134200

 

J'ACCUSE
Betrayal: France, the Arabs, and the Jews
By David Pryce-Jones (Encounter Books 171pp Ł20.99)

As I write, it is exactly a year since the desolate banlieues of France erupted in an orgy of violence, on a scale which had not been seen for generations. At the time, these riots were blamed on social exclusion. Since then, it has become clear that the rioters are not just 'immigrants' or 'youths', but are first and foremost Muslims. When they set light to a car, their cry is often: 'Allahu akhbar!' ('Allah is great!')

The violence, moreover, is endemic and ubiquitous. In 2005, there were 110,000 incidents of urban violence, including 45,000 vehicles burnt out. This year, there has been an average of over 100 incidents a day. Since the riots supposedly subsided last January, some 3,000 police officers are reported to have been injured. France is quite deliberately being made ungovernable.

This 'French intifada' was merely the culmination of a process that has turned many suburbs into no-go areas for the police and increasingly for non-Muslims too. In particular, the Islamist rabble-rousers who are behind the insurgency have incited their followers to attack Jews, who are now outnumbered by Muslims in France by at least ten to one.

How has it come to this? In this devastating indictment, the cri de coeur of an Englishman who loves France but is exasperated by the French, the background to this breakdown of civil society gradually emerges. David Pryce-Jones has discovered the explanation in the archives of the French foreign ministry, known after its imposing headquarters, the Quai d'Orsay. The corps diplomatique who have run this institution like a private club - known to initiates simply as 'la carričre' - are responsible not only for the decline of French prestige abroad, but also for creating the conditions for the unfolding catastrophe at home.

Like so many misfortunes, this one has its origins in the megalomania of the Bonaparte clan. For more than two centuries, since Napoleon's expedition to Egypt, French diplomacy has been gripped by a delusion of grandeur: the idea of France as une puissance musulmane, 'a Muslim power' - a phrase that has a new and sinister echo now.

French diplomats, determined to outdo their British and German rivals in great-power politics, were also convinced that France had a special mission civilisatrice in the Islamic world. Yet their sentimental orientalism was entirely compatible with an institutional anti-Semitism that is documented in shocking detail by Pryce-Jones. The rise of Zionism transformed this anti-Semitism from a mere prejudice, odious perhaps but peripheral to foreign policy, into a distorting mirror which motivated and reinforced the fatal misjudgements that have led France to its present predicament.

The French had pretensions to be the protecting power for all Catholics in the Middle East, and they saw Zionism as a competitor - one, moreover, that was associated in their eyes first with German and then with British interests. In response to what it saw as an impudent demand for a Jewish homeland, the Quai d'Orsay 'effectively launched the Arab nationalist movement' on the eve of the First World War.

Some of this book makes uncomfortable reading for Catholics, because several of the most outré orientalists who have controlled French policy in the last century turn out to have been Tartuffes of the worst kind. Pryce-Jones devotes a whole chapter to the curious case of Louis Massignon, who was the Arabist guru of the Quai d'Orsay both before and after World War II. Massignon's faith was a bizarre confection of Catholic and Islamic mysticism, and he ended up as a Melkite priest. Though he was married, it was the homoerotic attractions of Arab boys that evidently drew him to the East. He enjoyed cloak-and-dagger espionage, alternating between the robe and turban of an Egyptian imam and the habit of a Franciscan. He liked Lawrence of Arabia - as Pryce-Jones comments, 'they were two of a kind' - but enjoyed correcting the Englishman's Arabic grammar.

Massignon's influence was similarly pernicious. Put in charge of French propaganda to the Muslim world, he dedicated himself to building a Franco-Islamic 'bloc' or 'entente' and worked hard to scupper the Zionist project. His conversation and writings are riddled with rage against 'the ignominy of the Jews', and he even had the temerity to tell Martin Buber that Israel must stop 'Atlantic speculators' from exploiting Arab oil. Though he died in 1963, Massignon anticipated much of the contemporary French critique of the Zionist-Anglo-Saxon alliance.

Other pre-war intellectuals played an equally nefarious role in this episode of the betrayal of French rationalism - what Julien Benda called 'la trahison des clercs'. Pryce-Jones singles out Paul Morand, Jean Giraudoux and Paul Claudel: all writers, all senior officials at the Quai d'Orsay, all virulent anti-Semites. It is hard not to see the present prime minister and littérateur, Dominique de Villepin, as their spiritual descendant, when he describes Israel as 'a parenthesis in history'.

The one brief phase of rapprochement between post-war France and Israel, during the mid-1950s, took place despite the Quai d'Orsay, which was kept in the dark about defence and nuclear co-operation. The Suez operation was doomed partly because the ministry had to be kept out of the loop. Even the then foreign minister, Christian Pineau, had to tell colleagues: 'Above all, not a word to the Quai d'Orsay!'

Under General de Gaulle, France reverted to its traditional 'Muslim policy' and imposed an arms embargo on Israel. After the Six Day War in 1967, de Gaulle set the tone for future French statesmen by calling the Jews 'an elite people, self-assured and domineering' with 'a burning ambition for conquest'. He ignored Raymond Aron, who warned that de Gaulle had opened 'a new era in ... anti-Semitic history', and instead echoed the old Quai d'Orsay motto of France as a 'Muslim power'.

Thereafter, Israel looked to America, while France recklessly encouraged a succession of Muslim leaders who proved to be implacably hostile to the West, from Gaddafi to Saddam Hussein. It was the French who turned Yasser Arafat into a figure on the world stage and tolerated his terrorists in their midst. And it was the French who enabled Ayatollah Khomeini to launch his Islamic revolution from a suburb of Paris.

The cynicism, corruption and arrogance of all four presidents since de Gaulle - Pompidou, Giscard, Mitterrand and Chirac - have reinforced the déformation professionnelle of the Quai d'Orsay. Far from buying France influence in the Muslim world, the 'Arab policy' has merely imported the conflicts of the Middle East onto the streets of Paris.

Only now, when the country is in the grip of an Islamist jihad, has Chirac acknowledged that anti-Semitism - the existence of which in France he had long denied - is so serious that 'an attack against a French Jew is an attack against France'. It is David Pryce-Jones's great merit to have documented the conflict between this affirmation of the rights of French Jews at home and their denial abroad by French foreign policy. Whether the French public will heed this English indictment of their political class is more than doubtful, but Betrayal should resonate among those for whom Zola is still not a footballer but the author of J'accuse. http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/johnson_12_06.html

 

An Ulster research centre today said it had been unable to stop fraudsters using its name to con US people out of tens of thousands of dollars.

A Nigerian-based gang has been targeting Californian bookkeepers, claiming that they are doing experimental work for the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland (ARINI), which is based in Newforge Lane in Belfast.

However, US police have said they believe no one at the institute is involved in the scam, which involves the book-keepers being asked to send cash to Nigeria in return for false travellers cheques.

The gang first places adverts in Californian newspapers claiming that they need bookkeepers for part-time work.

They then claim to the bookkeepers that they are based in Africa, are going fieldwork for ARINI but are paid in UK travellers cheques, which they are unable to cash in the troubled west African country. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article2103989.ece

Posted at 08:13 pm by Psychomike
Make a comment

Monday, December 25, 2006
The Christmas Miracle Of 1914

THE CHRISTMAS TRUCE, ETHIOPIA OPENLY DECLARES WAR ON SOMALIA, BUSH TO COMMIT TROOPS TO IRAQ LONG TERM, JAMES BROWN HAS DIED

Dr. Richard Elam: Peace on earth: The Christmas truce of 1914

In 2006, peace on earth is as elusive as ever as small wars occur regularly and expand into bigger conflicts. Territorial “imperatives,” aggressive tendencies and desire for plunder always interfere with an ability to sustain a lasting peace. Wars are such a regular routine for humanity that the European lack of a continent-wide conflagration between the final exile of Napoleon in 1815 and the beginnings of the Great War (World War I) in 1914 is sometimes referred to as the “hundred year’s peace.”
As a general rule, wars and conflicts are extensions of foreign policy goals for nations and peoples. For this reason, the rationale for quarrels sometimes eludes those fighting. This explains why governments feel compelled to begin massive propaganda campaigns as a means of convincing the people of the righteousness of the cause. This is especially important for the soldiers themselves. Units of soldiers learn to protect each other because of cohesiveness as much as or more than hatred of the enemy.

What would happen, then, if the soldiers themselves simply decided to not fight? There was a popular poster in the ’60s that said “What if we had war and nobody came?” On this Christmas Eve we might remind ourselves that this is precisely what happened in December 1914 along several places in the trenches of the Great War.

The famous Christmas Eve truce spontaneously began at several points along the line as German, British, Scot and some French soldiers began to fraternize. It may have started with German soldiers placing Christmas trees on their parapets or with singing. One account has German soldiers singing “Stille Nacht” while their English counterparts sang “Silent Night.”

By the next day, foods were being exchanged along with small gifts. Soldiers from both sides mingled in no-man’s land and shared photos of family back home. There are stories of a soccer match played between Germans and British that the Germans won 3-2. Other accounts state that burial ceremonies were attended by soldiers from each side.

Attempts by higher officials to end the truce failed in most cases as it carried over until the end of Christmas day. In at least one case, the truce lasted until New Year’s Day. Not wanting to repeat this episode in subsequent years, artillery barrages were ordered on Christmas Eve and soldiers were routinely shuffled so they would not be too friendly with the enemy across the way. Nevertheless, much smaller episodes did occur in the following years.

Lesson of history: Throughout history there has existed a tension between people willing to fight for narrow national and ethnic interests, and the desire of individuals to get along with others. The result of that tension usually falls on the side of war, but on rare occasion comes down on the side of peace. The insanity of the Great War that began in August 1914 gave way to a brief moment of sanity in December as soldiers quit fighting to enjoy Christmas.

May your Christmas season be a time of peace and joy as you enjoy the birthday celebration of the Prince of Peace.



Dr. Richard Elam has been a

history and government

instructor for Hill College

Johnson County Campus for the past two decades.  http://cleburnetimesreview.com/cnhi/cleburnetimesreview/opinion/local_story_358110059.html

Christmas Day, 1914

My dear sister Janet,

It is 2:00 in the morning and most of our men are asleep in their dugouts—yet I could not sleep myself before writing to you of the wonderful events of Christmas Eve. In truth, what happened seems almost like a fairy tale, and if I hadn’t been through it myself, I would scarce believe it. Just imagine: While you and the family sang carols before the fire there in London, I did the same with enemy soldiers here on the battlefields of France!

As I wrote before, there has been little serious fighting of late. The first battles of the war left so many dead that both sides have held back until replacements could come from home. So we have mostly stayed in our trenches and waited.

But what a terrible waiting it has been! Knowing that any moment an artillery shell might land and explode beside us in the trench, killing or maiming several men. And in daylight not daring to lift our heads above ground, for fear of a sniper’s bullet.

And the rain—it has fallen almost daily. Of course, it collects right in our trenches, where we must bail it out with pots and pans. And with the rain has come mud—a good foot or more deep. It splatters and cakes everything, and constantly sucks at our boots. One new recruit got his feet stuck in it, and then his hands too when he tried to get out—just like in that American story of the tar baby!

Through all this, we couldn’t help feeling curious about the German soldiers across the way. After all, they faced the same dangers we did, and slogged about in the same muck. What’s more, their first trench was only 50 yards from ours. Between us lay No Man’s Land, bordered on both sides by barbed wire—yet they were close enough we sometimes heard their voices.

Of course, we hated them when they killed our friends. But other times, we joked about them and almost felt we had something in common. And now it seems they felt the same.

Just yesterday morning—Christmas Eve Day—we had our first good freeze. Cold as we were, we welcomed it, because at least the mud froze solid. Everything was tinged white with frost, while a bright sun shone over all. Perfect Christmas weather.

During the day, there was little shelling or rifle fire from either side. And as darkness fell on our Christmas Eve, the shooting stopped entirely. Our first complete silence in months! We hoped it might promise a peaceful holiday, but we didn’t count on it. We’d been told the Germans might attack and try to catch us off guard.

I went to the dugout to rest, and lying on my cot, I must have drifted asleep. All at once my friend John was shaking me awake, saying, “Come and see! See what the Germans are doing!” I grabbed my rifle, stumbled out into the trench, and stuck my head cautiously above the sandbags.

I never hope to see a stranger and more lovely sight. Clusters of tiny lights were shining all along the German line, left and right as far as the eye could see.

“What is it?” I asked in bewilderment, and John answered, “Christmas trees!”

And so it was. The Germans had placed Christmas trees in front of their trenches, lit by candle or lantern like beacons of good will.

And then we heard their voices raised in song.

Stille nacht, heilige nacht . . . .

This carol may not yet be familiar to us in Britain, but John knew it and translated: “Silent night, holy night.” I’ve never heard one lovelier—or more meaningful, in that quiet, clear night, its dark softened by a first-quarter moon.

When the song finished, the men in our trenches applauded. Yes, British soldiers applauding Germans! Then one of our own men started singing, and we all joined in.

The first Nowell, the angel did say . . . .

In truth, we sounded not nearly as good as the Germans, with their fine harmonies. But they responded with enthusiastic applause of their own and then began another.

O Tannenbaum, o Tannenbaum . . . .

Then we replied.

O come all ye faithful . . . .

But this time they joined in, singing the same words in Latin.

Adeste fideles . . . .

British and German harmonizing across No Man’s Land! I would have thought nothing could be more amazing—but what came next was more so.

“English, come over!” we heard one of them shout. “You no shoot, we no shoot.”

There in the trenches, we looked at each other in bewilderment. Then one of us shouted jokingly, “You come over here.”

To our astonishment, we saw two figures rise from the trench, climb over their barbed wire, and advance unprotected across No Man’s Land. One of them called, “Send officer to talk.”

I saw one of our men lift his rifle to the ready, and no doubt others did the same—but our captain called out, “Hold your fire.” Then he climbed out and went to meet the Germans halfway. We heard them talking, and a few minutes later, the captain came back with a German cigar in his mouth!

“We’ve agreed there will be no shooting before midnight tomorrow,” he announced. “But sentries are to remain on duty, and the rest of you, stay alert.”

Across the way, we could make out groups of two or three men starting out of trenches and coming toward us. Then some of us were climbing out too, and in minutes more, there we were in No Man’s Land, over a hundred soldiers and officers of each side, shaking hands with men we’d been trying to kill just hours earlier!

Before long a bonfire was built, and around it we mingled—British khaki and German grey. I must say, the Germans were the better dressed, with fresh uniforms for the holiday.

Only a couple of our men knew German, but more of the Germans knew English. I asked one of them why that was.

“Because many have worked in England!” he said. “Before all this, I was a waiter at the Hotel Cecil. Perhaps I waited on your table!”

“Perhaps you did!” I said, laughing.

He told me he had a girlfriend in London and that the war had interrupted their plans for marriage. I told him, “Don’t worry. We’ll have you beat by Easter, then you can come back and marry the girl.”

He laughed at that. Then he asked if I’d send her a postcard he’d give me later, and I promised I would.

Another German had been a porter at Victoria Station. He showed me a picture of his family back in Munich. His eldest sister was so lovely, I said I should like to meet her someday. He beamed and said he would like that very much and gave me his family’s address.

Even those who could not converse could still exchange gifts—our cigarettes for their cigars, our tea for their coffee, our corned beef for their sausage. Badges and buttons from uniforms changed owners, and one of our lads walked off with the infamous spiked helmet! I myself traded a jackknife for a leather equipment belt—a fine souvenir to show when I get home.

Newspapers too changed hands, and the Germans howled with laughter at ours. They assured us that France was finished and Russia nearly beaten too. We told them that was nonsense, and one of them said, “Well, you believe your newspapers and we’ll believe ours.”

Clearly they are lied to—yet after meeting these men, I wonder how truthful our own newspapers have been. These are not the “savage barbarians” we’ve read so much about. They are men with homes and families, hopes and fears, principles and, yes, love of country. In other words, men like ourselves. Why are we led to believe otherwise?

As it grew late, a few more songs were traded around the fire, and then all joined in for—I am not lying to you—“Auld Lang Syne.” Then we parted with promises to meet again tomorrow, and even some talk of a football match.

I was just starting back to the trenches when an older German clutched my arm. “My God,” he said, “why cannot we have peace and all go home?”

I told him gently, “That you must ask your emperor.”

He looked at me then, searchingly. “Perhaps, my friend. But also we must ask our hearts.”

And so, dear sister, tell me, has there ever been such a Christmas Eve in all history? And what does it all mean, this impossible befriending of enemies?

For the fighting here, of course, it means regrettably little. Decent fellows those soldiers may be, but they follow orders and we do the same. Besides, we are here to stop their army and send it home, and never could we shirk that duty.

Still, one cannot help imagine what would happen if the spirit shown here were caught by the nations of the world. Of course, disputes must always arise. But what if our leaders were to offer well wishes in place of warnings? Songs in place of slurs? Presents in place of reprisals? Would not all war end at once?

All nations say they want peace. Yet on this Christmas morning, I wonder if we want it quite enough.

 
Your loving brother,
Tom

About the Story

http://www.aaronshep.com/stories/061.html

 
Neoconservative pundit Bill Kristol believes that any increase of U.S. troops in Iraq must be a permanent increase to achieve success.
"There's no point having a short term surge," Kristol said on Fox News Channel. "Especially, if it's proclaimed ahead of time that it's just short term. Then [the enemy] goes into hiding for 3 or 6 months."

"We pull back and we're in the same situation," the Weekly Standard editor said. "Bush will commit -- I believe, when he speaks in a couple of weeks -- to doing this. That this is a strategy for victory and that he's willing to do this for the remaining 2 years of his presidency."

Forcasting the president's plan for Iraq, Kristol adds, "I think [Bush] will say 'We can win. We have to win. We're going to increase troop levels as part of a new strategy for the sake of victory.' And, so, it will not be a short term surge."

Kristol respects the president for increasing troops against conventional wisdom in D.C. and against the wishes of public sentiment, but mocks the majority of people that have doubts about a troop increase, saying, "This is a remarkable moment, though. I came to Washington 30 years ago. How often does a president go against -- what Juan referred to -- the wider consensus in this town, 'the military solution isn't possible?' It's a very broad consensus of the establishment and, I think, that's why there's so much anger among the establishment-types. 'Gee. The Baker-Hamilton Commission pronounced its verdict. And how dare the president make up his own mind and decide that he's not just going to just gracefully accept defeat with this nice bi-partisan patina of the Baker-Hamilton Commission. How dare he decide that we might win in Iraq." http://www.rawstory.com/printstory.php?story=4140

Ethiopia for the first time acknowledged its ground troops and tanks were fighting in Somalia as it Sunday attacked Islamist forces controlling much of the country and Ethiopian jets were reported to have bombarded Islamic positions. The actions marked a sharp escalation of conflict in the Horn of Africa nation, where Addis Ababa has long denied a major military presence beyond trainers and advisers helping Somalia’s weak government.

War planes hit the town of Beledweyne and other frontier outposts, residents said, while heavy artillery battles erupted at several towns deeper in Somalia, putting hundreds of civilians to flight. “The planes targetted infrastructure, Islamic installations like recruitment centres, and a small airstrip,” Hussein Muhamoud, a Beledweyne resident, told AFP from the town about 30 kilometres from the border. An Islamist officer in Beledweyne, Sheikh Hassan Derrow, said Ethiopian MiG aircraft were “bombing our civilians” and described the attackers as the “enemy of Allah”, while other Islamists renewed calls for a war against the Ethiopians and hundreds demonstrated in Mogadishu.

The government in mainly Christian Orthodox Ethiopia, which has its own Muslim population to consider as well as ethnic Somalis of the Ogaden region that has already seen two territorial wars, said the offensive was provoked by Islamist attempts to infiltrate Ethiopia. http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=36897

Ethiopian fighter jets bombed Mogadishu International Airport in the middle of Somalia’s capital on Monday, witnesses said, in the first direct attack on the headquarters of an Islamic movement attempting to wrest power from the internationally recognized governmenthttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16343382/

The American military is holding at least four Iranians in Iraq, including men the Bush administration called senior military officials, who were seized in a pair of raids late last week aimed at people suspected of conducting attacks on Iraqi security forces, according to senior Iraqi and American officials in Baghdad and Washington.

The Bush administration made no public announcement of the politically delicate seizure of the Iranians, though in response to specific questions the White House confirmed Sunday that the Iranians were in custody.

Gordon D. Johndroe, the spokesman for the National Security Council, said two Iranian diplomats were among those initially detained in the raids. The two had papers showing that they were accredited to work in Iraq, and he said they were turned over to the Iraqi authorities and released. He confirmed that a group of other Iranians, including the military officials, remained in custody while an investigation continued, and he said, “We continue to work with the government of Iraq on the status of the detainees.”

It was unclear what kind of evidence American officials possessed that the Iranians were planning attacks, and the officials would not identify those being held. One official said that “a lot of material” was seized in the raid, but would not say if it included arms or documents that pointed to planning for attacks. Much of the material was still being examined, the official said.

Nonetheless, the two raids, in central Baghdad, have deeply upset Iraqi government officials, who have been making strenuous efforts to engage Iran on matters of security. At least two of the Iranians were in this country on an invitation extended by Iraq’s president, Jalal Talabani, during a visit to Tehran earlier this month. It was particularly awkward for the Iraqis that one of the raids took place in the Baghdad compound of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, one of Iraq’s most powerful Shiite leaders, who traveled to Washington three weeks ago to meet President Bush. http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/sf/nyt12_25_6_2.htm

James Brown, who impacted popular music through three major pop music periods, has diedhttp://popculture.blogdrive.com

Posted at 10:09 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Friday, December 22, 2006
Failed Drug War, Military: No Troops!

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF: DON'T SEND MORE TROOPS, POWER SHARING IN N IRELAND BY MARCH, THE FAILED WAR ON DRUGS!
 
The Democrats have been pushing for a draft and more troops in Iraq from day one. Now that President Bush is considering increasing troop size, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are flat out opposed to the idea. And Have Gone Public!
The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate.

Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said.

But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public.

The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion.

At regular interagency meetings and in briefing President Bush last week, the Pentagon has warned that any short-term mission may only set up the United States for bigger problems when it ends. The service chiefs have warned that a short-term mission could give an enormous edge to virtually all the armed factions in Iraq -- including al-Qaeda's foreign fighters, Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias -- without giving an enduring boost to the U.S military mission or to the Iraqi army, the officials said.

The Pentagon has cautioned that a modest surge could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda, provide more targets for Sunni insurgents and fuel the jihadist appeal for more foreign fighters to flock to Iraq to attack U.S. troops, the officials said. 

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477_pf.html

Steny Hoyer, the Maryland congressman who was selected by the Democratic caucus to be the new House Majority Leader last week, set the Democratic Party’s tone in an interview on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” on ABC News on Sunday. Stephanopoulos asked Hoyer to respond to the position of Arizona Republican Senator John McCain that more US troops should be sent to Iraq. He also noted that one of the options under consideration by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group is to increase US troop strength to help crush militias operating in Baghdad.

“If that temporary increase is consistent with a plan to transition and to redeploy” US forces, Hoyer said, then he would be prepared to go along with it. Hoyer also repeated the position of many Democrats and sections of the military brass that the main problem with the Bush administration’s Iraq policy has been that not enough troops were sent in to begin with.

Hoyer’s comments were a clear signal to the Bush administration that the Democrats would support a troop increase if it could be packaged as a step towards an eventual drawdown. To emphasize this point, Hoyer stated toward the end of his interview that US troops were placed in danger not because they are forced to fight in Iraq, but because “their lack of numbers exposes them on a daily basis to danger and death.”

The new Majority Leader also made clear that the Democrats would not consider cutting off funding for the Iraq occupation. “We are not going to de-fund the troops in the field, period,” he said. The power to cut off spending on a war is the ultimate power wielded by Congress to compel the executive branch to change its foreign policy. Rejecting that out of hand means that the Bush administration can continue the war in Iraq, as Bush has pledged, until the end of his term in office, January 20, 2009.  http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/nov2006/dems-n20.shtml

Britain's secretary of state for Northern Ireland wished the province's divided community a Merry Christmas — and said Friday that the best present they could have was a revived Belfast assembly in 2007.

The British government expects Northern Ireland's Protestant and Catholic parties to forge a devolved power-sharing administration in March, ending a period of direct rule from London.

Local rule has been on hold since October 2002, when a coalition collapsed amid heightened tensions between Protestants and Sinn Fein, the party linked to the provisional IRA.

The current plan — unveiled following negotiations in St. Andrews, Scotland, in October — requires Sinn Fein leaders to accept the authority of Northern Ireland's police force in return for a share of power alongside Protestant leaders. So far, Sinn Fein has refused to call a special party conference to abandon it's decades-old policy of opposition to the police.

The plan calls for the Northern Ireland secretary, Peter Hain, to cede control of most government departments to local hands March 26 — or to dissolve the Northern Ireland Assembly if Protestants refused to work with Sinn Fein. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/22/europe/EU_GEN_Northern_Ireland.php

Paul Thomas: Why the US is losing the war at home too

While the politicians, diplomats, generals and spies engage in an increasingly academic debate over whether America is winning, losing or indeed has already lost the war in Iraq, the comprehensive nature of its defeat in another, more protracted war was rubbed in this week.

According to a report citing United States Government figures, marijuana is now America's most valuable cash crop, worth more than corn and wheat combined. Weed is bigger than cotton in Alabama, than grapes in California and peanuts in Georgia.

Despite billions of dollars and the strenuous efforts of local police forces, the FBI and the gigantic Drug Enforcement Agency, marijuana production has increased 10-fold over the past 25 years.

In Pentagon-speak, the war on drugs is an irony-rich environment. For instance, the losing side refuses to accept that the war was lost some time ago and its prolongation achieves nothing beyond turning a defeat into a rout. The drug warriors obviously never absorbed the cardinal rule of warfare: don't expend resources in a hopeless cause.

The core strategy of prohibition has brought about exactly the situation it was intended to prevent: the entrenched and widespread use and acceptance of recreational drugs in Western society.

Prohibition was supposed to marginalise and eventually eliminate the drugs trade. Instead, by creating an immensely profitable black market, it enabled the trade to thrive.

Because drugs are illegal, those who traffic in them pay no tax on their earnings, an enormous incentive to invest and expand. It seems strange that governments, which use the taxation system as a tool of economic management, should persist with policies that confer irresistible commercial logic and appeal on an activity of which they thoroughly disapprove.

With benefactors like these, who needs Santa Claus?

Because the power structure and society in general are either unwilling or unable to recognise defeat, no one has had to carry the can for this catastrophic failure of analysis and policy.

This is one key difference between the war on drugs and the war in Iraq: in the latter case the guilty men have been identified and are being picked off one by one.

Another key difference is the media and public reaction to the mounting evidence that the Iraq project has failed. The occupation began a mere three years ago yet the overwhelming consensus is that the US and Britain should declare defeat and get out, whatever the consequences for the people of Iraq and a region that's already dangerously close to flashpoint.

The war on drugs, however, will meander on pointlessly and counter-productively for years without protesters taking to the streets or committees crafting elegant strategies for disengagement, i.e. cutting and running.

But there are also striking similarities. Like the war on drugs, the war in Iraq has achieved the exact opposite of what was intended.

Instead of becoming the tolerant, secular democracy that would transform the Middle East by its benign example, as the neo-conservatives fondly imagined, Iraq has collapsed into an ungovernable chaos of sectarian barbarism, a model for no one save al Qaeda's gleeful nihilists.

Both wars were launched on the basis of two questionable assumptions. The first is that people know what's good for them - sobriety and clean living on the one hand, secular democracy on the other - and will embrace it given half a chance and provided the opportunity or temptation to do otherwise is curtailed.

The second is that, if used robustly enough, the instruments of state - prohibition and prosecution on the one hand, military force on the other - can create better people and better societies.

There will always be resistance to the legalisation of narcotics, particularly hard drugs. Those most likely to abuse drugs and suffer the consequences are the young, and as a society we place a high value on our children.

As the writer Auberon Waugh observed many years ago, parents are hardly going to agree that the children in whom they've invested years of care, effort, attention, and money should be free to choose oblivion as soon as they leave home.

But this is wishful thinking: children can and sometimes do choose oblivion as soon as they leave home or even earlier because the war on drugs has failed in its most basic and narrow objective - that of making it really, really hard for people to get their hands on dope.

Drugs are now so readily available and with so little legal risk attached that the real question is why the majority of children don't choose oblivion as soon as they leave home. It's not because they're afraid of ending up behind bars; it's because they grasp - thanks in part to anti-drug education - that drugs can be bad for you and oblivion hasn't got a lot going for it.

Enough of drugs: 'tis the season to be jolly and nothing encourages jollity like alcohol, the recreational drug we can guzzle with a clear conscience. I wish readers a happy, safe and oblivion-free festive season.  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=359&objectid=10416577

Posted at 10:22 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Iran Now A Nuclear State!

Iranian president: Our scienists have reached zenith, accessed nuclear fuel cycle

Iranian president: Our scientists have reached zenith, accessed nuclear fuel cycle
Yaakov Lappin

Iran is now a "nuclear power," its President, Mahmoud Ahamdinejad, delcared Wednesday, according to the Islamic Republic News Agency .

 

Threat?
Ahmadinejad: Israel, US will vanish / News agencies
Ahmadinejad says Israel, US, Britain will vanish – 'this is a divine promise;' Iran demands UN Security Council condemn Israel's nuclear development, place Israel's facilities under inspection
Full Story

During a speech delivered in the Western Iranian province of Javanroud, Ahmadinejad said: " The Islamic Republic of Iran is now a nuclear power, thanks to the hard work of the Iranian people and authorities."

 

The announcement of Iran as a "nuclear power" is bound to significantly escalate tensions between the West and Iran, and marks a dramatic stage in the Islamic Republic's nuclear campaign.

 

In recent days, the US military has begun to build up forces around the Gulf, in what is being seen as as a warning to Iran.

 

Ahmadinejad was also reported to have announced that "Iranian young scientists reached the zenith of science and technology and gained access to the nuclear fuel cycle without the help of big powers."

 

The Iranian president began the speech by saying that "the powerful Iranian nation resists bullying powers and will defend its rights, including the right to pursue peaceful nuclear technology," the IRNA said.

 

 

 

http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3342489,00.html

 

 

Iran’s oil minister, Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh, said today that the country will begin to purchase all oil industry related equipment in euros instead of dollars as the Iranian government has elected to base its new-year budget in euros.

"Based on the government's policy of substituting the euro for the dollar, all oil industry purchase contracts will be done in the euro," the official IRNA news agency quoted Vaziri as saying.

http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=27390

 

'All I want to say is that the age of hardship, threat and spite will come to an end someday and, God willing, Jesus would return to the world along with the emergence of the descendant of the Islam's holy prophet, Imam Mahdi, and wipe away every tinge of oppression, pain and agony from the face of the world,' Ahmadinejad said.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53430

 

 

The next time you beat your keyboard in frustration, think of a day when it may be able to sue you for assault. Within 50 years we might even find ourselves standing next to the next generation of vacuum cleaners in the voting booth.

Far from being extracts from the extreme end of science fiction, the idea that we may one day give sentient machines the kind of rights traditionally reserved for humans is raised in a British government-commissioned report which claims to be an extensive look into the future.

Visions of the status of robots around 2056 have emerged from one of 270 forward-looking papers sponsored by Sir David King, the UK government’s chief scientist. The paper covering robots’ rights was written by a UK partnership of Outsights, the management consultancy, and Ipsos Mori, the opinion research organisation.

“If we make conscious robots they would want to have rights and they probably should,” said Henrik Christensen, director of the Centre of Robotics and Intelligent Machines at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

The idea will not surprise science fiction aficionados. It was widely explored by Dr Isaac Asimov, one of the foremost science fiction writers of the 20th century. He wrote of a society where robots were fully integrated and essential in day-to-day life.

In his system, the ‘three laws of robotics’ governed machine life. They decreed that robots could not injure humans, must obey orders and protect their own existence – in that order.

Robots and machines are now classed as inanimate objects without rights or duties but if artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous, the report argues, there may be calls for humans’ rights to be extended to them.   http://www.ft.com/cms/s/5ae9b434-8f8e-11db-9ba3-0000779e2340.html

 

Somali Islamists and troops defending the government's only stronghold battled with rockets and heavy weapons today at two frontline areas as a European Union envoy flew in to stave off the brewing war.

The flare-ups to the southwest and southeast of Baidoa, the interim government's surrounded outpost, heightened fears of a Horn of Africa conflict a day after the expiry of an Islamist deadline for government-allied Ethiopian troops to leave. With a battle under way 70km southwest of Baidoa since late on Tuesday, another clash erupted today just 25km southeast of the town on a strategic portion of the frontline where both sides' fighters have massed.

"Neither side is winning. It is the Ethiopian troops who are fighting the Islamists. I am trapped," a driver stranded between the opposing sides said, with the sounds of the fighting echoing in the background. "Bullets and heavy rockets are flying everywhere. Fresh Islamist troops are now fighting Ethiopians who are waiting for backup," the driver, who declined to give his name, said.
http://www.sabcnews.com/africa/east_africa/0,2172,140570,00.html

 

A little more than six months after seizing control of the Somali capital of Mogadishu, Somalia's Islamic Courts Union is enforcing its form of law and order across a wide swath of the east African nation, home to a large majority of the population.  But the hard-line Islamist leaders' alleged ties to terrorism, and their expansionist policies, have brought Somalia to the brink of war with neighboring Ethiopia.  VOA's East Africa Correspondent Alisha Ryu, who has traveled widely in Somalia, tells us in this yearend report, there are fears that clashes in Somalia could trigger a wider regional conflict.  http://origin.www.voanews.com/english/2006-12-19-voa36.cfm

 

U.K. authorities investigating the death of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko detected radiation contamination in three London hotel workers, the Health Protection Agency said.

Litvinenko died on Nov. 23 after exposure to the radioactive substance polonium 210. The isotope was later discovered in at least 12 London locations, and on Dec. 7, the agency said it was detected in ``low levels'' in seven workers employed at the Pine Bar in the Millennium Hotel, which Litvinenko had visited on Nov. 1, the day he reported feeling ill.

``Results received from a further two members of staff at the Millennium Hotel London Mayfair, and a member of staff at the Sheraton Hotel, Park Lane, London, show that they have been exposed to low levels of Polonium-210,'' the agency said today in an e-mailed statement. ``The levels are not significant enough to result in any illness in the short term and any increased risk in the long term is likely to be very small.''

The trail of polonium has taken the investigation to Russia and Germany. Dmitry Kovtun, a Russian businessman who met Litvinenko at the Millennium hotel on Nov. 1, this month fell ill with radiation poisoning, and authorities in Germany found traces of polonium in places frequented by Kovtun in Hamburg before his visit to the U.K.

British investigators today concluded two weeks of inquiries in Moscow into the case, the Russian Prosecutor General's Office said today in a statement on its Web site. Two days before he died, Litvinenko blamed his illness on the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has denied the allegation.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahbgz4FYWksw&refer=worldwide

Posted at 11:11 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Gaza Strip In Civil War!

CIVIL WAR BREAKS OUT IN GAZA STRIP, WHAT'S BEHIND THE PALESTINIAN CRISIS?, PAKISTAN INTEL AGENT PROTECTED BIN LADEN!
 
Schools have been closed in Gaza amid what officials say is a state of anarchy caused by fighting between Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah.

The education ministry acted after several children were among those hurt in a day of clashes that killed three.

Violence has flared since Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas on Saturday called for new elections, a move the Hamas-led government branded a "coup".

Mr Abbas has called for all factions to respect a truce agreed on Sunday.

In a statement, he called on "all, without exception, to adhere to a ceasefire and to end the killings and all other operations in order to maintain our national unity".

 
Q&A: Palestinian crisis
The Palestinian territories are experiencing some of their tensest moments for decades, as inter-factional rivalries spill out into the most serious street fighting yet. The BBC News website's Martin Asser explains why the pressures have reached such a dangerous point.

What has led to the sharp rise in tension?

Rival Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas have been trying to agree a unity government that would solve a crisis sparked by Hamas's victory in January elections and an international boycott that followed it.

Talks have been difficult and recently hit an apparently irreparable deadlock. Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, of Fatah, has now called fresh elections.

For many months now, law and order has been deteriorating in the Palestinian territories, which are also in the grip of an economic crisis, exacerbated by Israel's military siege and the international boycott.

With no salvation in sight, violence has taken a nasty turn in Gaza in the last week, with the killing of three sons of a Fatah security chief and an apparent attempt on the life of Prime Minister Ismail Haniya, of Hamas.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6182969.stm

 
Over 50 new species have been discovered in a 'Lost World' on the island of Borneo in just 18 months, say scientists.

Among them are two tree frogs, a whole range of plants and trees and 30 brand new types of fish including a tiny one less than a centimetre long and a catfish with an adhesive belly that allows it to stick to rocks.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=423523&in_page_id=1965

'All I want to say is that the age of hardship, threat and spite will come to an end someday and, God willing, Jesus would return to the world along with the emergence of the descendant of the Islam's holy prophet, Imam Mahdi, and wipe away every tinge of oppression, pain and agony from the face of the world,' Ahmadinejad said.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53430

The chief U.S. negotiator said Tuesday that there had been no progress yet at renewed six-nation talks aimed at persuading North Korea to abandon its nuclear arms program in exchange for economic aid and security guarantees.

As the disarmament talks convened Monday for the first time since the North tested a nuclear device, Pyongyang insisted it be treated as a full-fledged nuclear power. But the United States dismissed the communist regime's opening comments as unsurprising rhetoric and warned time was running out for the North to dismantle its nuclear arsenal or face sanctions.

``In terms of implementing the joint statement, I'd say (there was) not too much progress from yesterday,'' U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill told reporters early Tuesday.

http://www.registerguard.com/news/2006/12/19/a14.int.koreanukes.1219.p1.php?section=nation_world

Afghanistan says it has arrested a Pakistani intelligence agent who acted as a key link with al-Qaeda leaders.

Presidential spokesman Karim Rahimi said the agent had been detained in eastern Kunar province carrying documents which proved his guilt.

The news came a day after intelligence officials said an Afghan general had been arrested for spying for Pakistan.

Afghanistan has long blamed Pakistan for cross-border attacks by the Taleban. Islamabad denies the charges.

'Bin Laden escort'

Mr Karimi named the man arrested as Sayed Akbar, who he said worked for Pakistan's controversial Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency.

Officials say he has confessed to his "illegal activities" in Afghanistan. These are said to include escorting Osama Bin Laden last year from Nuristan to Chitral.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6192939.stm

Posted at 11:27 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Sunday, December 17, 2006
Special War On Drugs Theme

THE WAR ON DRUGS: IT ISN'T THEIR MONEY SO......
 
A synthetic version of the active ingredient in marijuana, a legal treatment for nausea in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, also helps symptoms like pain, anxiety and depression, according to research presented on Friday.

"The findings show how great the potential is to improve the quality of life for cancer patients," said lead investigator Dr. Vincent Maida of the University of Toronto.   http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=governmentFilingsNews&storyID=2006-12-16T001537Z_01_N15421976_RTRIDST_0_CANCER-CANNABIS-UPDATE-1.XML

NATIONAL REVIEW has attempted during its tenure as, so to speak, keeper of the conservative tablets to analyze public problems and to recommend intelligent thought. The magazine has acknowledged a variety of positions by right-minded thinkers and analysts who sometimes reach conflicting conclusions about public policy. As recently as on the question of troops to Bosnia, there was dissent within the family from our corporate conclusion that we'd be best off staying home.

For many years we have published analyses of the drug problem. An important and frequently cited essay by Professor Michael Gazzaniga (Feb. 5, 1990) brought a scientist's discipline into the picture, shedding light on matters vital to an understanding of the drug question. He wrote, for instance, about different rates of addiction, and about ambient pressures that bear on addiction. Elsewhere, Professor James Q. Wilson, now of UCLA, has written eloquently in defense of the drug war. Milton Friedman from the beginning said it would not work, and would do damage.

We have found Dr. Gazzaniga and others who have written on the subject persuasive in arguing that the weight of the evidence is against the current attempt to prohibit drugs. But NATIONAL REVIEW has not, until now, opined formally on the subject. We do so at this point. To put off a declarative judgment would be morally and intellectually weak-kneed.

Things being as they are, and people as they are, there is no way to prevent somebody, somewhere, from concluding that ``NATIONAL REVIEW favors drugs.'' We don't; we deplore their use; we urge the stiffest feasible sentences against anyone convicted of selling a drug to a minor. But that said, it is our judgment that the war on drugs has failed, that it is diverting intelligent energy away from how to deal with the problem of addiction, that it is wasting our resources, and that it is encouraging civil, judicial, and penal procedures associated with police states. We all agree on movement toward legalization, even though we may differ on just how far.

We are joined in our judgment by Ethan A. Nadelmann, a scholar and researcher; Kurt Schmoke, a mayor and former prosecutor; Joseph D. McNamara, a former police chief; Robert W. Sweet, a federal judge and former prosecutor; Thomas Szasz, a psychiatrist; and Steven B. Duke, a law professor. Each has his own emphases, as one might expect. All agree that the celebrated war has failed, and that it is time to go home, and to mobilize fresh thought on the drug problem in the context of a free society. This symposium is our contribution to such thought.
--THE EDITORS Prepare to have your mind blown, when real conservatives speak out on drugs and the drug war: http://www.nationalreview.com/12feb96/drug.html

"The reign of tears is over. The slums will soon be only a memory. We will turn our prisons into factories and our jails into storehouses and comcribs. Men will walk upright now, women will smile, and the children will laugh. Hell will be forever for rent."

That is how Billy Sunday, the noted evangelist and leading crusader against Demon Rum, greeted the onset of Prohibition in early 1920. We know now how tragically his hopes were doomed. New prisons and jails had to be built to house the criminals spawned by converting the drinking of spirits into a crime against the state. Prohibition undermined respect for the law, corrupted the minions of the law, created a decadent moral climate-but did not stop the consumption of alcohol.

Despite this tragic object lesson, we seem bent on repeating precisely the same mistake in the handling of drugs.

ETHICS AND EXPEDIENCY

On ethical grounds, do we have the right to use the machinery of government to prevent an individual from becoming an alcoholic or a drug addict? For children, almost everyone would answer at least a qualified yes. But for responsible adults, I, for one, Would answer no. Reason with the potential addict, yes. Tell him the consequences, yes. Pray for and with him, yes. But I believe that we have no right to use force, directly or indirectly, to prevent a fellow man from committing suicide, let alone from drinking alcohol or taking drugs.

I readily grant that the ethical issue is difficult and that men of goodwill may well disagree. Fortunately, we need not resolve the ethical issue to agree on policy. Prohibition is an attempted cure that makes matters worse-for both the addict and the rest of us. Hence, even if you regard present policy toward drugs as ethically justified, considerations of expediency make that policy most unwise.

Consider first the addict. Legalizing drugs might increase the number of addicts, but it is not clear that it would. Forbidden fruit is attractive, particularly to the young. More important, many drug addicts are deliberately made by pushers, who give likely prospects their first few doses free. It pays the pusher to do so because, once hooked, the addict is a captive customer. If drugs were legaily available, any possible profit from such inhumane activity would disappear, since the addict could buy from the cheapest source.

Whatever happens to the number of addicts, the individual addict would clearly be far better off if drugs were legal. Today, drugs are box incredibly expensive and highly uncertain in quality. Addicts are driven to associate with criminals to get the drugs, become criminals themselves to finance the habit, and risk constant danger of death and disease.

Consider next the test of us. Here the situation is crystal clear.  The harm to us from the addiction of others arises almost wholly from the fact that drugs are illegal. A recent cominittee of the American Bar Association estimated that addicts commit one-third to one-half of all street crime in the U.S. Legalize drugs, and street crime would drop dramatically. Moreover, addicts and pushers are not the only ones corrupted. Immense sums are at stake. It is inevitable that some relatively low-paid police and other government officials-and some high-paid ones as well-will succumb to the temptation to pick up easy money.

LAW AND ORDER

Legalizing drugs would simultaneously reduce the amount of crime and raise the quality of law enforcement. Can you conceive of any other measure that would accomplish so much to promote law and order?

But, you may say, must we accept defeat? Why not simply end the drug traffic? That is where experience under Prohibition is most relevant. We cannot end the drug traffic. We may be able to cut off opium from Turkey but there are  innumerable other places where the opium poppy grows. With French cooperation, we may be able to make Marseilles an unhealthy place to manufacture heroin but there are innumerable other places where the simple manufacturing operations involved can be carried out. So long as large sums of money are involved-and they are bound to be if drugs are illegal-it is literally hopeless to expect to end the traffic or even to reduce seriously its scope. In drugs, as in other areas, persuasion and example are likely to be far more effective than the use of force to shape others in our image.

http://www.druglibrary.org/special/friedman/prohibition_and_drugs.htm

A founding father of the Reagan Revolution has put his John Hancock on a pro-pot report.

Milton Friedman leads a list of more than 500 economists from around the U.S. who today will publicly endorse a Harvard University economist's report on the costs of marijuana prohibition and the potential revenue gains from the U.S. government instead legalizing it and taxing its sale. Ending prohibition enforcement would save $7.7 billion in combined state and federal spending, the report says, while taxation would yield up to $6.2 billion a year.

The report, "The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition," (available at www.prohibitioncosts.org) was written by Jeffrey A. Miron, a professor at Harvard , and largely paid for by the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), a Washington, D.C., group advocating the review and liberalization of marijuana laws.

At times the report uses some debatable assumptions: For instance, Miron assumes a single figure for every type of arrest, for example, but the average pot bust is likely cheaper than bringing in a murder or kidnapping suspect. Friedman and other economists, however, say the overall work is some of the best yet done on the costs of the war on marijuana.

At 92, Friedman is revered as one of the great champions of free-market capitalism during the years of U.S. rivalry with Communism. He is also passionate about the need to legalize marijuana, among other drugs, for both financial and moral reasons.

"There is no logical basis for the prohibition of marijuana," the economist says, "$7.7 billion is a lot of money, but that is one of the lesser evils. Our failure to successfully enforce these laws is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people in Colombia. I haven't even included the harm to young people. It's absolutely disgraceful to think of picking up a 22-year-old for smoking pot. More disgraceful is the denial of marijuana for medical purposes."

Securing the signatures of Friedman, along with economists from Cornell, Stanford and Yale universities, among others, is a coup for the MPP, a group largely interested in widening and publicizing debate over the usefulness of laws against pot.

http://www.forbes.com/services/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html

Three Kern County Detention Deputies were arrested Friday as a result of a month-long investigation. Sgt. Donal Lundgren, 34, along with deputies Patrick Holloway, 26, and Joshua Bankston, 25, were arrested Friday morning on drug related charges. The arrests came after officers served search warrants on two of the deputies' homes.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16232281/

John Walters, the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, recently startled the media by admitting that the $3.3 billion Plan Colombia, now in its fourth year, has failed to make a significant dent in the amount of cocaine flowing out of that country. Walters added hastily, however, that he expected to see substantial progress in the next year or so.

His comments are the latest in a familiar and dreary pattern. Each new initiative in Washington's international campaign to stem the supply of illegal drugs is launched with great fanfare. During the early phases, isolated examples of success are touted as evidence that the overall strategy is working. Ultimately, though, reality intrudes and it becomes clear that the drug supply is as plentiful as ever. Thrown on the defensive, drug warriors admit that the task has proven more difficult than anticipated but argue that if we stay the course, success is just around the corner. When such predictions prove faulty often enough, the existing initiative is quietly buried and a new one is launched with the appropriate fanfare.

That is what has occurred with Plan Colombia. The Clinton administration initiated the program in 2000, and within months U.S. officials boasted about the amount of coca plants (the raw ingredient for cocaine) that the aerial spraying program was eradicating. Similar claims of success continued until recently. The State Department's most recent annual International Narcotics Control Strategy Report contended that the amount of coca cultivation in Colombia fell from 420,000 acres in 2001 to 280,000 acres in 2003.

That statistic was superficially impressive, but it ignored two important factors. First, although the acreage devoted to coca cultivation may have declined in Colombia, the acreage in Peru and Bolivia (the other two major players) had risen sharply. That reversed the trend of the mid- and late 1990s when U.S.-funded anti-drug measures led to a crackdown that reduced cultivation in Peru and Bolivia-only to see it explode in Colombia and spread to new locales such as Ecuador and Brazil.

Second, even if the acreage devoted to coca in the entire Andean region has declined slightly in recent years, drug traffickers have become more efficient. In other words, they are able to produce the same amount of cocaine from a smaller number of cultivated plants. The bottom line is that the supply of cocaine flowing into the United States (and other markets) remains plentiful, as even the nation's drug czar now admits.

Indeed, the situation in Colombia may be even worse than Walters' remarks suggest. Washington has placed great confidence in the willingness of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe to wage a vigorous war on drugs. But a 1991 assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency concluded that Uribe was in league with drug trafficking organizations. Indeed, the DIA concluded that Uribe himself was one of the top 100 drug traffickers.

Uribe has denied those allegations, and the U.S. State Department criticized the DIA's assessment and expressed continued confidence in him. Nevertheless, given how thoroughly drug trafficking cartels have penetrated Colombia's political establishment over the years, the episode creates more than a little doubt.

Drug-related corruption within the Colombian police and military is certainly notorious. Just last month, the police commander of one of the major drug-producing provinces and his deputy were sacked after an 80 lb. cocaine seizure mysteriously disappeared. That was the latest in a series of scandals that included the resignation of the head of the National Police when it became apparent that members of his force took more than $1 million in bribes to return some two tons of cocaine they had seized from traffickers.

Plan Colombia has not succeeded any better than earlier anti-drug initiatives. And contrary to the drug czar's tenacious optimism, that pattern is not likely to improve in the next year-or the next 10 years. One wonders how many times U.S. officials have to travel down the road of a prohibitionist strategy before they realize that it always leads to a dead end. Given the huge profit margin that exists because drugs are illegal, supply side campaigns are doomed to fail. It is time that Walters and other policymakers recognize that reality. 

http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-13-04-2.html

 
The conspiracy theorists have a new one: they
believe that workers in America's airports and seaports
are now helping smuggle drugs into this country.
Law-enforcement officials call these alleged operations
"internal conspiracies."

     Can you believe it? This story actually made the
front page of THE NEW YORK TIMES, which usually derides
"conspiracy theories," but told this one with a straight
face.

     Next we'll be told that high government officials in
Latin America have been involved in these "conspiracies."
Then we'll be told that our own government is involved,
with the aid of UFOs.

     OK, enough cheap ridicule. These conspiracies are
real enough. For example, according to the TIMES, some
employees of Delta Airlines actually did use their
positions and access to security checkpoints to help get
drugs from Puerto Rico past airport customs. Since last
October [October 1996], 148 airport and seaport workers
have been arrested nationwide for their participation in
drug-smuggling operations.

     What's the solution to this problem? Well, as the
late political analyst James Burnham used to say, "Where
there's no solution, there's no problem."

     Illegal drugs are a hugely lucrative business, and
the chief effect of the federal "war on drugs" has been
to drive the prices up. It has also had other effects,
though, such as generating conspiracies. It's impossible
to calculate how many conspirators there are, or how high
in our own government they reach. All we know is that the
money is awfully tempting to an awful lot of people.

     If you were a Colombian drug "kingpin," would you
worry about the war on drugs? Sure. Just as Al Capone
worried about Prohibition. Like most government
regulation, the war on drugs makes the costs of entry
into the drug market too high for small fry, but for that
very reason it's great for the big operators. And it's
turning much of the world into the equivalent of Chicago
in the Roaring '20s.

     The global drug trade illustrates the volcanic power
of the free market. Like it or not, it's beyond any
possibility of suppression. That trade involves two
fungible commodities: drugs and cash. Both of these are
far easier to conceal than liquor, and liquor defeated
all efforts to ban it by law.

     Unlike liquor, illegal drugs can't even be kept out
of prisons. How are they going to be banished from a
continent? All we can be sure of is that the attempt to
"eliminate" drugs will involve more and more people in
criminal conspiracies, including many of the people who
are responsible for enforcing the laws. The war on drugs
is a formula for corruption.

     Governments like to set themselves impossible tasks,
such as "eliminating" things that can't be eliminated.
Why not? Government officials don't have to worry about
costs. It's not their money that's being wasted; they
receive their salaries even when they fail.
http://www.sobran.com/columns/2006/061128.shtml

Posted at 05:05 pm by Psychomike
Make a comment

Saturday, December 16, 2006
Iran Has Nukes, CIA Post 911!

BRITISH TROOPS ATTACK TALIBAN STRONGHOLD, SINN FEIN REJECTS POLICING OFFER, EXCLUSIVE: WHAT THE CIA DID AFTER 911, WHY LITVINENKO HAD TO DIE!
During their meeting in Tehran, the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad informed Palestinian prime minister Ismael Haniyeh that the Palestinians should be patient as Iran will issue a dramatic statement about changes in the strategic balance in the region, according to reports published in the Israeli daily 'Maariv' on Friday .
 
Sinn Fein will not collude in any attempt to exclude republicans from a future justice ministry, the party's justice spokesman has said.

The DUP had suggested that a future minister should be elected by a weighted cross-community vote.

This method, however, is likely to exclude both Sinn Fein and the DUP.

Sinn Fein's Gerry Kelly told the BBC Inside Politics programme he "will not collude" in his own party's exclusion from office.

"What party could argue for its own exclusion in these circumstances?" Mr Kelly asked. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6184907.stm

Northern Ireland punk legends Stiff Little Fingers are to return to Belfast for a show at the Ulster Hall on March 9, 2007, to mark 30 years in the music business.

http://u.tv/newsroom/indepth.asp?id=11541&pt=e

Sen. John McCain on Saturday urged the United States' reluctant NATO partners to allow their troops to engage in combat operations against the resurgent Taliban, especially in Afghanistan's rebellious south.

The Arizona Republican, a likely contender in the 2008 presidential race, also criticized Pakistan for tolerating sanctuaries for Taliban fighters and other Islamic militants in tribal regions along its borders with Afghanistan.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AFGHAN_US?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-12-16-16-54-14

Hundreds of British troops in Afghanistan yesterday swept into Kandahar province as part of the biggest operation against the Taliban heartland in months.

A column of 200 vehicles containing 500 soldiers and Royal Marines advanced across the border under cover of darkness from neighbouring Helmand province, where UK forces have been concentrated up until now, with orders to help Canadian troops push back Taliban insurgents gathering for a fresh offensive against the allies.

News of the operation came amid warnings that Afghanistan could sound the "death knell" of Nato, due to the refusal of many of its members to supply desperately needed troops.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=423001&in_page_id=1811

IRAQ'S Shiite Prime Minister called today for the return of all officers of Saddam Hussein's disbanded army in an overture to disaffected Sunni Arabs aimed at reducing sectarian violence.

Nuri al-Maliki made the call at a national reconciliation conference of Shiites, Sunni Arab and Kurdish politicians convened to halt communal bloodshed that has raised the spectre of civil war and was a major reason for US President George W. Bush's decision to review his Iraq strategy.

“The new Iraqi army is opening the door to former Iraqi army officers. Those who do not come back will be given pensions,” Mr Maliki said, in remarks in which he also told leaders to embrace reconciliation as a “safety net from death and destruction”.

Shortly after the US invasion to topple Saddam, US administrator Paul Bremer dissolved the Iraqi army, a move experts said drove many Sunni Arab soldiers and officers into the Sunni-led insurgency. http://www.news.com.au/sundaymail/story/0,23739,20941415-401,00.html

Murdered Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko was killed because of an eight-page dossier he had compiled on a powerful Russian figure for a British company, a business associate told the BBC on Saturday.

Litvinenko died in London on November 23 after receiving a lethal dose of radioactive polonium 210. On his deathbed, he accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of ordering his killing. The Kremlin has denied involvement.

The BBC said it had obtained extracts of the dossier, which British detectives also have, from an unnamed source. The BBC said the report contained damaging personal details about a "very highly placed member of Putin's administration".

"Litvinenko obtained the report on September 20," Shvets told the BBC. "Within the next two weeks he gave the report to Andrei Lugovoy. I believe that triggered the entire assassination."  http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2006-12-16T141636Z_01_L16859096_RTRUKOC_0_UK-BRITAIN-POISONING.xml&WTmodLoc=HP-C2-Business-2

Hunters in India’s remote northeast are tracking a rogue elephant blamed for 14 deaths in the region and named after Osama bin Laden by fearful villagers.
The order came after the bull dubbed Laden, which has twice evaded attempts to kill him, was blamed for the death of a woman Wednesday near the thickly wooden evergreen jungle where it lives.
‘‘We have ordered a hunter to shoot and kill the 10-feet tall tuskless bull that is believed to have killed up to 14 people in the past two years,’’

http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/index.php?s=&url_channel_id=34&url_article_id=22687&url_subchannel_id=&change_well_id=2

A special unit of the Russian secret service could have provided the polonium that killed the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Sources in Russia have suggested that a secret unit called Department V could have obtained the radioactive substance that has left a trail across Europe.

Polonium 210 is only produced in a small number of state-controlled facilities and Department V, also known as Vympel, is charged with guarding Russia's nuclear installations. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/16/wrussia16.xml

A few days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the CIA station chief in Rome paid a visit to the head of Italy's military intelligence agency, Adm. Gianfranco Battelli, to float a proposal: Would the Italian secret services help the CIA kidnap terrorism suspects and fly them out of the country?

The CIA man did not identify which targets he had in mind but was "expressly referring to the possibility of picking up a suspected terrorist in Italy, bringing him to an airport and sending him from there to a foreign country," Battelli, now retired, recalled in a deposition.

This initial secret contact and others that followed, disclosed in newly released documents, show the speed and breadth with which the CIA applied in post-9/11 Europe a tactic it had long reserved for the Third World — "extraordinary rendition," the extrajudicial abduction of Islamic radicals overseas for interrogation in friendly countries.

A year after the first contact, the CIA officer held another meeting with his Italian counterparts, this time sharing a list of more than 10 "dangerous people" the agency was tracking in Italy, Belgium, Austria and the Netherlands, according to a deposition from Gen. Gustavo Pignero, another high-ranking Italian military intelligence official. "It was clear that this was an aggressive search project, that their willingness to employ illicit means was clear," Pignero said, adding that the list was later destroyed and he could not recall the names.

U.S. spies drew up suspect lists with the help of European intelligence agencies and chased some of the men around the globe before putting a brake on the operations in early 2004, about a year after the invasion of Iraq, according to documents unearthed in criminal investigations, lawsuits and parliamentary inquiries.

All told, the U.S. agency took part in the seizure of at least 10 European citizens or legal immigrants, some of them from countries not cited in that list of "dangerous people" received by the Italian spies. Four renditions occurred on European soil: in Sweden, Macedonia and Italy. Six operations targeted people who were traveling abroad or who had been captured in Pakistan; European intelligence agencies provided direct assistance to the CIA in at least five of those cases, records show.

Each prisoner was then secretly handed over to intelligence services in the Middle East or Africa with histories of human rights abuses. Some remain imprisoned in those countries; others have been taken to the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. One man was later released after being taken from the Balkans to Afghanistan, the victim of an apparent case of mistaken identity.

In the early stages, the CIA had prepared even more ambitious plans, according to the depositions from the Italian intelligence officials, who testified last summer during a criminal investigation into a CIA-sponsored kidnapping of a radical Islamic cleric in Milan.

For example, Pignero said in his deposition that the CIA's Rome station chief had offered in 2002 to abduct a fugitive leader of the Red Brigades — a Marxist network blamed for dozens of assassinations in Italy — who had found refuge in South America. "The Americans would capture him and turn him over to us, and we in return would have to 'extradite' him to Italy without any legal proceedings," Pignero said.

In exchange, the CIA wanted help in abducting Islamic radicals living in the Italian cities of Turin, Vercelli and Naples, Pignero said. Italian intelligence officials rejected the offer, he added, because it was "contrary to international laws."

Reports of clandestine CIA operations have fueled deep public anger in Europe, where many people regard renditions as a blatant violation of national sovereignty and international law. Since last year, prosecutors have opened four separate criminal investigations into CIA activities in Europe. A dozen countries have conducted legislative inquiries into whether local spy agencies were involved.

Last month, a European Parliament committee investigating CIA operations in Europe condemned the practice of rendition "as an illegal and systematic instrument used by the United States" and called it "counterproductive in the fight against terrorism."

"I think that after the 11th of September, the CIA thought that all the ways useful to capture their enemies, the alleged terrorists, were now possible," Giovanni Claudio Fava, an Italian legislator who led the parliamentary probe, said in an interview in Brussels. "They wanted to clean Europe of all these dangerous, alleged terrorists. They didn't have faith in the quality and capacity of our own security controls and our justice system."

In the past year, U.S. officials have sought to repair the diplomatic damage. They have met repeatedly with their European counterparts to defuse opposition to renditions, the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo and the disclosure in November 2005 that the CIA had set up secret prisons for terrorism suspects in Eastern Europe.

John Bellinger, legal adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said U.S. diplomats have made some headway. But he added that ongoing political disputes have "undermined cooperation and intelligence activities."

"I'd say that many European government officials and academics acknowledge now that there is a legal murkiness that applies to international terrorism," he said in a telephone interview from Washington. "On the negative side of the ledger, we do continue to have these hysterical, inflated allegations denouncing the United States that unfortunately do fan the flames of suspicion and anti-Americanism."

The CIA declined to comment.

'He Was Too Loud'

The most detailed disclosures about the CIA's European rendition project have emerged from Milan, where Italian prosecutors have spent two years investigating the disappearance of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, a militant Egyptian-born cleric known as Abu Omar.

When Nasr vanished in February 2003, police and prosecutors in Milan thought at first that he had slipped out of the country on his own, perhaps to join resistance forces in Iraq in advance of the U.S.-led invasion. The CIA lent credence to their suspicions a few months later, when it delivered an intelligence bulletin to Rome stating that Nasr had been seen in the Balkans.

In fact, prosecutors later discovered, Nasr had been grabbed on the street in Milan as he was walking to a mosque and stuffed into a white van, which sped to Aviano Air Base, a joint U.S.-Italian military installation. From there, he was put on a plane to Ramstein Air Base in Germany, and onward to Cairo, where Nasr claims he was tortured for months with electric shocks and sexually abused.

Prosecutors in Milan have since issued arrest warrants on kidnapping charges for 25 CIA operatives and a U.S. Air Force officer, alleging that they conspired with Italian secret service agents to abduct Nasr. Although none of the Americans is likely to be extradited to Italy, prosecutors have served notice that they intend to try them in absentia and asked a judge last month to formally indict the defendants.

Senior Italian intelligence officials have also been charged in the case, including Gen. Nicolo Pollari, director of the Italian military intelligence agency known as Sismi. Pignero, his former deputy, was arrested in June, shortly after he gave his deposition to prosecutors. He died of cancer three months later, on Sept. 11.

European investigators are still examining other mysterious cases of missing or detained people. Among them are the disappearance a few weeks before Nasr's kidnapping of another Egyptian-born Islamic fundamentalist.

Gamal al-Menshawi, a physician and occasional mosque preacher who knew Nasr personally, had left his home in Graz, Austria, bound for the Islamic holy city of Mecca, Saudi Arabia. His wife was waiting for him there, but he never arrived, according to Egyptian exiles in Austria and Italy who know him.

Menshawi's trail vanished after he arrived in Amman, Jordan, for a flight connection. He later surfaced in Egypt. European Parliament investigators have concluded he was detained there for two years without facing charges.

He was released in 2005 and is living in Alexandria, Egypt, according to Austrian journalists. He has severed contact with friends and colleagues in Europe, who strongly suspect he was subjected to a rendition, although they lack proof or direct evidence of U.S. involvement.

Arman Ahmed al-Hissini, imam of the Viale Jenner mosque in Milan and an acquaintance of Menshawi and Nasr, said both have been silenced by the Egyptian security services.

"The Arab secret services, they give names to the CIA of people who they want, people who are on the outside, such as Europe," said Hissini, an Egyptian native known locally as Abu Imad. "They give the names to the CIA, because the CIA can go to work in these countries."

There is also little doubt about Menshawi's fate among those who knew him in Austria's Islamic community.

"I see the American government as being primarily responsible," said Mohamed Mahmoud, chairman of a group called Islamic Group of Austria. "This is not the first time someone has disappeared."

"The Americans look around in Europe for who is being loud, who is speaking out, and then those people are kidnapped," he added. "He was very vocal; he was too loud for them. He talked openly about Egypt's government, about the U.S. government, about the Islamic community in Austria."

'They Needed Information'

About the same time, another Islamic militant from Austria disappeared during a stopover at the Amman airport.

Masaad Omer Behari, a Sudanese citizen who had lived in Austria for more than a decade, has said he was arrested by Jordanian secret service agents on Jan. 12, 2003, as he was traveling home to Vienna from a trip to Sudan.

Behari told European Parliament investigators in October that he was held for three months in a Jordanian prison, where he was interrogated about Islamic militants in Austria and elsewhere in Europe. "On the first day I was in prison, they told me they did not think I was a terrorist, but that they needed information about the Islamic scene in Vienna," he said.

Documents obtained by the investigators show that Behari had been under surveillance by Austria's domestic intelligence service since 1998, when he was interrogated about an alleged plot to blow up the U.S. Embassy in Vienna. Behari said he was innocent and never faced charges, but was pressured by Austrian secret service agents to leave the country after the Sept. 11 hijackings.

"I have experienced hard times because I did not cooperate with the security authorities in Europe and with the Americans," Behari said, according to a transcript of his testimony. The Austrians "threatened me that they would cause me problems. I thought it was only 'blah-blah,' but it was the truth."

Austrian authorities said they have not opened official inquiries into the disappearances of Menshawi or Behari, in part because neither is an Austrian citizen.

"Since the alleged abductions did not take place on Austrian soil, in an Austrian airplane or on an Austrian ship, we see no need for action," said Rudolf Gollia, spokesman for the Austrian Interior Ministry.

-- Special correspondent Shannon Smiley in Berlin contributed to this report.

http://www.dailytidings.com/2006/1216/stories/1216_cia.php

Posted at 05:05 pm by Psychomike
Make a comment

Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Saudi's To Back Iraq Sunni!

RULES OF THE TALIBAN, ROCKETS HIT ISRAEL, PALESTINIANS CAN SUE ISRAEL, SOMALIA GIVES ETHIOPIA ONE WEEK TO LEAVE- OR FACE FULL WAR, GULF CALLS FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST ISRAEL, JAPAN WANTS N. KOREA TO EXPLAIN KIDNAP PROGRAM

An extraordinary little document is making the rounds among the Taliban of Afghanistan. As first reported in NEWSWEEK by Ron Moreau and Sami Yousafzai on Dec. 3, the stapled pamphlet called simply “Layeha,” or “Rule Book,” is only nine pages long. But it speaks volumes about the Taliban: their strategy, their following, their potential virtues and their persistent vices, and the full text is well worth reading.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16169421/site/newsweek/   See the last post today for an amazing article on religion and politics merger!

President Hamid Karzai directly accused Pakistan's government today of supporting the Taliban insurgency in his country, hours after a suicide attacker exploded himself in an Afghan governor's compound, killing eight.

Taliban militants have increasingly targeted government officials. Since September, they have killed one provincial governor, narrowly missed another, and killed several district-level police, intelligence and administrative chiefs.
"The problem is not Taliban. We don't see it that way. The problem is with Pakistan," Karzai told foreign journalists during a trip to Kandahar, the Taliban's former stronghold."  http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-afghanistan1212,0,5315569.story?coll=bal-nationworld-headlines

Fiji's ousted prime minister said Tuesday the South Pacific country was sliding toward "the worst kind of dictatorship," and offered to hold talks with the military regime to find a way to restore democracy as quickly as possible.  http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-12-12-fiji-coup_x.htm

The head of the Gulf Cooperation Council Tuesday demanded the application of the UN charter’s Chapter Seven on Israel after its premier implied the Jewish state has nuclear weapons. “We call for application against Israel of Chapter VII, that is to say, the imposition of sanctions,” Secretary General Abderrahman al-Attiya said in Kuwait, on the sidelines of a conference on cooperation between the GCC and Nato.

Attiya called on the United States not to apply a policy of “double standards” and to “work for the application (against Israel) of the resolutions of international legitimacy and of Chapter VII.” Chapter VII deals with action the UN Security Council might take regarding threats to the peace, breaches of the peace and acts of aggression.

As a first step, it says the council may call for member states to impose sanctions, including complete or partial interruption of economic relations and the severance of diplomatic relations. If those measures are deemed to have failed, military action can be called for. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert sparked an uproar after an apparent slip of the tongue in which he for the first time listed Israel as a nuclear power.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=35389

Spanish police arrested 11 suspected Islamic radicals Tuesday in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta on Morocco's north coast, an Interior Ministry spokesman told CNN.

The operation struck at "international terrorism" and the 11 suspects are linked to a cell of the terrorist Salafist Group for Call and Combat, Spain's Interior Ministry said in a statement.

The detainees are suspected of being in the initial phase of plotting a terrorist attack, CNN partner station CNN+ reported, citing Interior Ministry sources.

The suspects were involved in recruiting and indoctrination for Islamic terrorist activities to carry out attacks and had connections to terrorists in Britain and Morocco, the Interior Ministry statement said.  http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/12/12/spain.arrests/index.html?section=cnn_latest

Saudi Arabia has told the Bush administration that it might provide financial backing to Iraqi Sunnis in any war against Iraq's Shiites if the United States pulls its troops out of Iraq, according to American and Arab diplomats.

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia conveyed that message to Vice President Dick Cheney two weeks ago during Cheney's whirlwind visit to Riyadh, the officials said. During the visit, King Abdullah also expressed strong opposition to diplomatic talks between the United States and Iran, and pushed for Washington to encourage the resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, senior Bush administration officials said.

The Saudi warning reflects fears among America's Sunni Arab allies about Iran's rising influence in Iraq, coupled with Tehran's nuclear ambitions. King Abdullah II of Jordan has also expressed concern about rising Shiite influence, and about the prospect that the Shiite-dominated government would use Iraqi troops against the Sunni population.

A senior Bush administration official said Tuesday that part of the administration's review of Iraq policy involved the question of how to harness a coalition of moderate Iraqi Sunnis with centrist Shiites to back the Iraqi government led by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki.

The Saudis have argued strenuously against an American pullout of Iraq, citing fears that Iraq's minority Sunni population would be massacred. Those fears, United States officials said, have become more pronounced as a growing chorus in Washington has advocated a draw-down of American troops in Iraq, coupled with diplomatic outreach to Iran, which is largely Shiite.  http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/13/africa/web.1213saudi.php

Palestinian militants had fired three rockets into southern Israel on Tuesday afternoon, violating a fragile ceasefire, Israeli and Palestinian sources said.

Israeli sources said the rockets were fired from northern Gaza Strip which has been the scene of a large-scale Israeli offensive in November.

Today's home-made rocket attack was the fifth breach by the Palestinians of the ceasefire, they added.

There were no reports about casualties.

Saraya al-Quds, the military wing of the Islamic Jihad (Holy War) claimed responsibility for the attacks which targeted Sderot city in Israel.

In a statement faxed to the press, the brigades said that the attack came in response to the ongoing Israeli violations of the ceasefire and the aggression against the Palestinian people.

The statement noted that Israeli troops had arrested a senior Islamic Jihad militant in the West Bank city of Tulkarem.

The ceasefire, took effect in the beginning of this month, has prevented Israel from expanding Gaza military operations. But Israel insists that the ceasefire was only applied to the Gaza Strip despite the Palestinians' request for an extension of calm to the West Bank.

Source: Xinhua  http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200612/13/eng20061213_331789.html

The Israeli supreme court has overturned part of a 17-month-old blanket ban by the government on Palestinians seeking compensation for harm inflicted by the Israel Defence Forces.

The decision reopens the way for at least some law suits in the Israeli courts by Palestinians who suffer bereavement, injury or property damage at the hands of the Israeli military in Gaza or the West Bank, by cancelling a section of an amendment approved by the Knesset in July 2005.

The ruling, one of the last to be written by the recently retired court chairman Aharon Barak, was broadly welcomed by the left, and human rights groups. Adalah, one of the rights groups which had petitioned the court, said that the ruling, while "based on technicalities", would open the way for some claims through civil courts.

But right-wing Knesset members queued up to denounce the ruling and hinted at attempts to reintroduce the legislation through the Knesset. Attorney Yossi Fuchs, a member of the right-wing "Land of Israel Legal Forum" said: "The ruling is a parting gift from Aharon Barak to Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, a gift that will buy Barak a respected status in the eyes of the international legal community at the expense of the security of Israel's citizens."

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2070194.ece

Somalia's powerful Islamist movement has given neighboring Ethiopia a one-week deadline to withdraw its troops protecting the weak government or face major attacks.

The declaration appeared to push the country even closer to a full-scale conflict that many believe could engulf the Horn of Africa and drew a swift warning from the government at its seat in Baidoa.

"We are giving a deadline to the invading forces," said Yusuf Mohamed Siad, security chief for the Supreme Islamic Council of Somalia (SICS).

"If Ethiopian forces inside our territory do not withdraw after a week, we will not hesitate to launch full-scale attacks on them," he told reporters at a news conference in the Islamist-held capital of Mogadishu.

"From today on, all Ethiopians must start leaving Somalia, if they do not they will be responsible for the bloodshed that will follow," Siad said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061212/wl_afp/somaliaunrestethiopia_061212162137

Key witnesses in the Alexander Litvinenko investigation are missing, with their families claiming that they fear for their lives.

The sudden disappearance of a number of leading figures linked to the affair will make it even harder for British detectives, whose inquiry has now spread across five countries.  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,172-2501273,00.html

A key witness in the radiation death of former Russian security agent Alexander Litvinenko claimed the poisoning took place earlier than is widely believed, a newspaper reported Wednesday.

Andrei Lugovoi, a security agent-turned-businessman who met with Litvinenko at a London hotel on Nov. 1, the day Litvinenko suspected he was poisoned, said in an interview with the Moskovsky Komsomolets tabloid that he and Litvinenko were poisoned on Oct. 16.

"Who told you that the contamination took place on Nov. 1? It took place much earlier, on Oct. 16," Lugovoi was quoted as saying by the paper. Lugovoi is himself undergoing radiation checks in a Moscow clinic.

Litvinenko, 43, a former Russian agent and a Kremlin critic, died Nov. 23 of poisoning from polonium-210.

Lugovoi supported his claim by saying that he and Litvinenko visited a London-based security firm where traces of polonium were later found only in mid-October, but did not go there on Nov. 1, meaning that the contamination couldn't have taken place on that day.

http://dose.canada.com/news/story.html?id=1bae0593-c91e-428a-9f3d-ab63b69819b8

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's conference questioning the Holocaust came to an end Tuesday, but not before hearing former KKK Imperial Wizard David Duke say that gas chambers were not used to kill Jews.

"The Zionists have used the Holocaust as a weapon to deny the rights of the Palestinians and cover up the crimes of Israel," Duke told a gathering of nearly 70 "researchers" in Tehran at Ahmadinejad's invitation.

"This conference has an incredible impact on Holocaust studies all over the world," said Duke, a former state representative in Louisiana who twice ran for president.

"The Holocaust is the device used as the pillar of Zionist imperialism, Zionist aggression, Zionist terror and Zionist murder," Duke told The Associated Press.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236014,00.html

The United Nations' specialist on North Korean human rights is calling for Pyongyang to provide full details about the fate of Japanese abducted by North Korean agents. The appeal came as a Japanese official indicated that the number of abductees is far higher than the 17 officially recognized so far. VOA's Steve Herman reports from Tokyo.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Il admitted in 2002 that his agents had abducted 13 Japanese during the 1970's and '80s. The abductees were used to teach North Korean agents about Japanese language and culture.

Mr. Kim allowed five Japanese to return home, but said the other eight had died. Japan has so far identified 17 people as abductees, but activists maintain that the number is far higher - and the Japanese government might now be ready to agree. http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-12-13-voa12.cfm

 The Islamic Courts Union has given Ethiopia a week to withdraw its troops from Somalia and says it will attack any that do not leave."Starting today, if the Ethiopians don't leave our land within seven days, we will attack them," Sheikh Yusuf Mohamed Siad, the Islamic courts defence spokesman, said in Mogadishu on Tuesday.

He was referring to the alleged thousands of troops that diplomats and other witnesses say have crossed over the border to protect the government of Abdullahi Yusuf, the Somali president, in Baidoa.  http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/33C46686-5F0C-4662-94BE-9B174A7A6044.htm

Mad Prophets, Nazis, Bin Laden Rage in History of Religious War

By George Walden

Dec. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Whatever drove Michael Burleigh to begin work years ago on his history of politics and religion, his timing was inspired. ``Sacred Causes: Religion and Politics from the European Dictators to Al Qaeda'' offers us some historical and moral bearings as we flounder in the mire of Islamic terror.

The first part of this two-volume account, ``Earthly Powers,'' traced the clash of religion and politics from the Enlightenment to World War I. ``Sacred Causes'' brings the story up to the present.

Burleigh has held posts at Oxford, the London School of Economics and Cardiff University. An erudite writer, he seeds his account of religious and political entanglements with things not normally highlighted by more conventional academics.

Writing about Germany, for example, he discusses both established churches and the activities of semi-crazed prophets who were already contaminating German minds in the early 1920s. It wasn't just the country's currency that was being devalued, Burleigh suggests; it was its culture, too. The nihilism, pseudo- radicalism and sexual self-advertisement of many a creative artist helped pave the way for Hitler.

The most controversial aspect of Burleigh's latest book will be his defense of the Roman Catholic Church, and its record on the Holocaust especially. The author demonstrates in intricate detail how clerics did what they humanly could to stand up to a dictator who described Nazism as a Christian movement yet was ready to crush any priest who overstepped the line. He cites innumerable attempts to rescue Jews, including how Hungarian Catholic leaders issued them with certificates of conversion.

Soviet Onslaught

Burleigh concedes that Pope Pius XII could have been clearer and more forceful. Yet he argues that our moralizing age underestimates the stark dilemmas the church faced.

While Hitler played cat and mouse with clerics, Russian communists attacked religion with a savagery that German churches were largely spared. As well as murdering priests and believers who resisted the plundering of the Orthodox Church, atheist campaigners devised a particularly loathsome tactic: They disinterred and displayed the corpses of monks or nuns to prove they weren't immune to putrefaction.

Like Nazism, the Marxist-Leninist credo was a perversion of religion, and it's satisfying to learn that the embalmment of the bloodthirsty demigod Lenin was overseen by an ``Immortalization Commission.'' The credulous West was meanwhile debating a possible convergence between communism and Christianity.

`Sinister Cult'

Burleigh is comprehensive. In addition to Soviets and Germans, he explores Spain, France, Poland and Ireland. His honesty in describing the murkier interactions of politics and religion is so unusual that it can startle. Consider this caption on a photograph of Irish Republican Army women carrying a coffin:

``Ireland's matriarchal culture played a key role in keeping the sentimental flames of Republican nostalgia alive throughout the Troubles,'' it says. ``Funerals were one of the central features of this sinister cult.''

That, I would say, is a bald statement of fact, yet you won't hear many leftist academics agreeing. Their blood pressure will rise further when Burleigh gets to al-Qaeda and declines to join the anti-American chorus. Though Burleigh doesn't endorse President George W. Bush's entire response to 9/11, he warns Europeans against the notion that there's some easy, ``soft'' way of defeating terrorism or solving the problem of Iraq.

Cold Shower

Burleigh does more than catalog the horrifying things done both against religion and in its name. He makes you understand that the West today faces something without precedent. The current conflict isn't against pure evil; it's against pure irrationality, armed with weapons devised by Western scientific rationalism.

An extremist teacher of Osama bin Laden, Abdullah Azzam, described the drive to restore the Muslim caliphate this way: ``Jihad and the rifle alone: no negotiations, no conferences, no dialogue.'' Given the unlikelihood of dragging the world back to the 7th century, one can say al-Qaeda has no war aims but death.

A great cold shower of sense and intelligence on the central issue of our age, Burleigh's book will, I suspect, be misrepresented in all the usual quarters.

Published by HarperPress in the U.K., ``Sacred Causes'' (557 pages, 25 pounds) will be available from HarperCollins in the U.S. next year.

(George Walden is a critic for Bloomberg News and the author of ``Time to Emigrate?'' The opinions expressed are his own.)

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=anQml736l2qE&refer=muse

Posted at 06:53 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Sunday, December 10, 2006
Kosovo On The Brink Of War!

CLINTON'S FOLLY: KOSOVO ON THE BRINK OF WAR!
 
I was talking to some college students at the local Irish pub and they were saying the usual propaganda, "Bush lied about the WMD, he had no plan for the region once the troops got there and he has no exit strategy" they proclaimed using the usual bumper sticker logic. After patiently listening I said, " I agree. Bush turning the war over to the State Department was a tragedy. Why he decided to use the Clinton foreign policy plan is beyond me".
 
Everyone got quiet. Real quiet.
 
One spoke up.
 
"What does Clinton have to do with this?", he asked me.
 
Well you see, Clinton claimed over 200,000 had been killed by the Serbs. After the war, we found out this was false. Just like the WMD!
 
I could tell they had never heard this before. Thank you U.S. media.
 
Then we had no plan what to do when we took control of Kosovo- and the Serbs actually ran out the people we claimed we were trying to protect- because we supported a terror group with ties to the Balkin mob and al Qaeda!
 
Dead quiet. Other folks at the bar started to listen. A girl in the group just stared at the floor.
 
And we are STILL in the region, which is about to explode again.
 
One guy looked up with a "gotcha" look on his face.
 
"We aren't still in the area, or it would be on the news". I explained the press in this country can only handle one war at a time, which is why you never hear about our advisers in Ethiopia leading the fighting in Somalia. I told them they should come to this website. We've been covering the war since day 1. Our media hasn't. There was no exit strategy, just a vague notion of bringing democracy to the region! Sound familiar?
 
I continued. "Well at least the left wasn't bamboozled! They had the ethics, morality and courage to stand up to Clinton's war and protest. Risking arrest, being spied on and- oh wait a second. I just remembered. THEY DID NOTHING.", I'm on a role at this point, "In fact they cheered the over 1000 carpet bombing missions we went on."
 
One guy asked me what was going to happen. I said war like we've never seen before in the region. 2007 is going to be bloody. Yep, Bush should never have followed the Clinton plan." Here is the latest news on the growing crisis, followed by the story the press does not want you to know, what really happened when Clinton launched what he called, the humanitarian war.
 
Carla Del Ponte, the chief U.N. war crimes prosecutor for former Yugoslavia, said Wednesday she was "surprised and disappointed" by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's decision to invite Serbia to join a cooperation program that is a first step toward possible membership.

"The prosecutor is highly surprised because she was not consulted," Del Ponte's spokesman Anton Nikiforov told Serbia's B92 radio. "She is disappointed because it turns out that Serbia was rewarded for its noncooperation with the ( U.N. war crimes) tribunal."

http://www.paulding.net/bin/url.cgi/13492.17

Armed men in masks have been appearing in parts of Kosovo since Western powers said they will postpone a decision on the future of the breakaway Serbian province, residents said yesterday.

Kosovo's 2 million Albanians are growing increasingly impatient and some leaders in the UN-administered province have warned of unrest since Western powers said a decision on the Albanian majority demand for independence will be delayed.

Newspapers have reported a brief gunfight with police, residents said masked men have been stopping cars at night Western Kosovo and the police have confirmed at least one checkpoint was set up by men in black less than 100 km from the capital Pristina.

The men in black, who residents say claim to be part of the outlawed Albanian National Army (ANA) have appeared in the wake of last month's announcement from Western countries and Russia that they would allow an end-2006 deadline to pass. The ANA is a shadowy group labelled terrorists in 2003 by the UN mission running the breakaway Serbian province.

Police confirmed that armed men in black set up a checkpoint this week near the town of Djakovica, 80km west of the capital Pristina, but that it was not clear who they were. "We just know they are armed people wearing masks", regional spokesman Avni Gjevukaj said. Prime Minister Agim Ceku, a former guerrilla leader, said such groups were "damaging the image and security of Kosovo."  http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=World_News&subsection=Rest+of+the+World&month=December2006&file=World_News2006120975112.xml

A U.N. envoy scolded the Serbian government in Belgrade for preventing Serbs from integrating into Kosovo's mainly ethnic-Albanian institutions.
      Joachim Rucker, chief of the U.N. civil administration mission in Kosovo, said the biggest problem is that Belgrade obstructs Kosovo Serbs from taking part in political and economic life in the province, the Serbian news agency Beta reported Friday.
      In an interview with Radio Free Europe, Rucker said he believes a majority of 100,000 Serbs living in Kosovo would wish to be included in Kosovo's democratic and multinational future.
http://www.washtimes.com/upi/20061208-081028-9864r.htm

The Serbs in Macedonia support Belgrade in its policy to retain Kosovo within Serbia, the Macedonian Makfax informs, citing the Chair of the Democratic party of the Macedonian Serbs and an MP in the Macedonian Parliament Ivan Stojilkovic, who was received by Serbia’s PM Vojislav Kostunica in Belgrade. His party press release reads that “Stojilkovic expressed Macedonian Serbs’ support for the demand of consistent policy in retaining Serbia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.”

http://www.focus-fen.net/?id=n101180

HOW DID WE GET HERE:

Kosovo and the rise of Slobodan Milošević (1986–1990)

In Kosovo growing Albanian nationalism and separatism in response to persecution led to growing ethnic tensions between Serbs and Albanians. An increasingly poisonous atmosphere led to wild rumours being traded and otherwise trivial incidents being blown out of proportion.

It was against this tense background that sixteen prominent members of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU, from its Serbian initials) began work in June 1985 on a draft document that was leaked to the public in September 1986. The SANU Memorandum, as it has become known, was hugely controversial. It focused on the political difficulties facing Serbs in Yugoslavia, pointing to Tito's deliberate hobbling of Serbia's power and the difficulties faced by Serbs outside Serbia proper.

The Memorandum[5] (PDF) paid special attention to Kosovo, arguing, in obvious error, that the province's Serbs were being subjected to "physical, political, legal and cultural genocide" in an "open and total war" that had been ongoing since the spring of 1981. It claimed that Kosovo's status in 1986 was a worse historical defeat for the Serbs than any event since liberation from the Ottomans in 1804, thus ranking it above such catastrophes as the Nazi occupation or the First World War occupation of Serbia by the Austro-Hungarians. The Memorandum's authors claimed that 200,000 Serbs had moved out of the province over the previous twenty years and warned that there would soon be none left "unless things change radically." The remedy, according to the Memorandum, was for "genuine security and unambiguous equality for all peoples living in Kosovo and Metohija [to be] established" and "objective and permanent conditions for the return of the expelled [Serbian] nation [to be] created." It concluded that "Serbia must not be passive and wait and see what the others will say, as it has done so often in the past."

NATO's bombing campaign lasted from March 24 to June 11, 1999, involving up to 1,000 aircraft operating mainly from bases in Italy and aircraft carriers stationed in the Adriatic. Tomahawk cruise missiles were also extensively used, fired from aircraft, ships and submarines. The United States was, inevitably, the dominant member of the coalition against Serbia, although all of the NATO members were involved to some degree — even Greece, despite publicly opposing the war. Over the ten weeks of the conflict, NATO aircraft flew over 38,000 combat missions. For the German Air Force (Luftwaffe) it was the first time it had participated in a conflict since World War II. In addition to airpower, one battalion from the US Army's 82nd Airborne Division was deployed to help combat missions. The battalion secured Apache Attack helicopter refueling sites and a small team forward deployed to the Albania/Kosovo border to identify targets for Allied/NATO airstrikes.

The proclaimed goal of the NATO operation was summed up by its spokesman as "Serbs out, peacekeepers in, refugees back". That is, Serbian troops would have to leave Kosovo and be replaced by international peacekeepers in order to ensure that the Albanian refugees could return to their homes. However, the summary had an unfortunate double meaning which caused NATO considerable embarrassment after the war, when over 200,000 Serbs and other non-Albanian minorities fled or were expelled from the province. It was also suggested that a small victorious war would help give NATO a new role. Propaganda terms "humanitarian bombing" and "humanitarian war" were employed by the politicians.

At the start of May, a NATO aircraft attacked an Albanian refugee convoy, believing it was a Serbian military convoy, killing around 50 people. NATO admitted its mistake 5 days later, but the Serbs accused NATO of deliberately attacking the refugees. On May 7, NATO bombs hit the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, killing three Chinese journalists and outraging Chinese public opinion. NATO claimed they were firing at Yugoslav positions. The United States and NATO later apologized for the bombing, saying that it occurred because of an outdated map provided by the CIA. This was challenged by a joint report from The Observer (UK) and Politiken (Denmark) newspapers [18] which claimed that NATO intentionally bombed the embassy because it was being used as a relay station for Yugoslav army radio signals. The bombing strained relations between China and NATO countries and provoked angry demonstrations outside Western embassies in Beijing. According to one news source, unnamed high ranking NATO sources confirmed in 2005 that the attack was in fact deliberate: "The NATO sources told Defense & Foreign Affairs that the attack was based on intelligence that then Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic was to have been in the Embassy at the time of the attack. The attack, then, was deliberately planned as a "decapitation" attack, intended to kill Milosevic."

Many on the left of Western politics saw the NATO campaign as US aggression and imperialism, while critics on the right considered it irrelevant to their countries' national security interests. Veteran anti-war campaigners such as Noam Chomsky, Edward Said, Justin Raimondo, and Tariq Ali were prominent in opposing the campaign. However, in comparison with the anti-war protests against the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the campaign against the war in Kosovo aroused much less public support.

There was, however, criticism from all parts of the political spectrum for the way that NATO conducted the campaign. NATO officials sought to portray it as a "clean war" using precision weapons. The US Department of Defense claimed that, up to June 2, 99.6% of the 20,000 bombs and missiles used had hit their targets. However, the use of technologies such as depleted uranium ammunition and cluster bombs was highly controversial, as was the bombing of oil refineries and chemical plants, which led to accusations of "environmental warfare". The slow pace of progress during the war was also heavily criticised. Many believed that NATO should have mounted an all-out campaign from the start, rather than starting with a relatively small number of strikes and combat aircraft.

The choice of targets was highly controversial. The destruction of bridges over the Danube greatly disrupted shipping on the river for months afterwards, causing serious economic damage to countries along the length of the river. Industrial facilities were also attacked, damaging the economies of many towns. In fact, as the Serbian opposition later complained, the Serbian military was using civilian factories as weapons plants: the Sloboda vacuum cleaner factory in the town of Čačak also housed a tank repair facility, while the Zastava plant in Kragujevac made both cars and Kalashnikov rifles. In addition only state owned factories were targeted. No private or foreign owned industrial sites were bombed. Perhaps the most controversial deliberate attack of the war was that made against the headquarters of Serbian television on April 23, which killed at least fourteen people. NATO justified the attack on the grounds that the Serbian television headquarters was part of the Milošević regime's "propaganda machine".

Some critics have accused the coalition of leading a war in Kosovo under the false pretense of genocide.[3] This was, in fact, no pretense at all. President Clinton of the United States, and his administration, were accused of inflating the number of Kosovar Albanians killed by Serbians.[4] Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen, giving a speech, said, "The appalling accounts of mass killing in Kosovo and the pictures of refugees fleeing Serb oppression for their lives makes it clear that this is a fight for justice over genocide."[5] On CBS' Face the Nation Cohen claimed, "We've now seen about 100,000 military-aged men missing...They may have been murdered."[6] Clinton, citing the same figure, spoke of "at least 100,000 (Kosovar Albanians) missing".[7] Later, talking about Serbian elections, Clinton said, "they're going to have to come to grips with what Mr. Milošević ordered in Kosovo...They're going to have to decide whether they support his leadership or not; whether they think it's OK that all those tens of thousands of people were killed...".[8] Clinton also claimed, in the same press conference, that "NATO stopped deliberate, systematic efforts at ethnic cleansing and genocide."[9] Clinton compared the events of Kosovo to the Holocaust. CNN reported, "Accusing Serbia of 'ethnic cleansing' in Kosovo similar to the genocide of Jews in World War II, an impassioned President Clinton sought Tuesday to rally public support for his decision to send U.S. forces into combat against Yugoslavia, a prospect that seemed increasingly likely with the breakdown of a diplomatic peace effort."[10] Clinton's State Department also claimed Serbian troops had committed genocide. The New York Times reported, "the Administration said evidence of 'genocide' by Serbian forces was growing to include 'abhorrent and criminal action' on a vast scale. The language was the State Department's strongest yet in denouncing Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević."[11] The State Department also gave the highest estimate of dead Albanians. The New York Times reported, "On April 19, the State Department said that up to 500,000 Kosovar Albanians were missing and feared dead."[12]

The Kosovo war had a number of important consequences in terms of the military and political outcome. The status of Kosovo remains unresolved — formally it is still part of Serbia, but in practice the Serbian government has no say or practical influence over the affairs of the province, which is run as a UN protectorate under a UN-appointed governor. It remains an issue of considerable controversy with Kosovo Albanians continuing to press for independence, a demand which is now widely expected to become a reality in the immediate future.

In January 2006, Contact Group (US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Russia) foreign ministers met in London and issued a statement outlining their vision for Kosovo's future status. Their statement explicitly reiterated that the "Contact Group Guiding Principles of November 2005 make clear that there should be: no return of Kosovo to the pre-1999 situation, no partition of Kosovo, and no union of Kosovo with any or part of another country." The statement also clearly states that "the (status) settlement needs, inter alia, to be acceptable to the people of Kosovo." [26] (PDF) and set a target of achieving a negotiated settlement in the course of 2006.

Milošević survived the immediate aftermath of the war, but the effective loss of Kosovo was a major factor in provoking the popular revolt which overthrew him in 2000. He was subsequently arrested and taken to The Hague, where he died from natural causes in his cell, awaiting trial for crimes against humanity on 10 March 2006.

Despite the successful conclusion of the war, Kosovo exposed gaping weaknesses in NATO. It revealed how dependent the European members had become on the United States military — the vast majority of combat and non-combat operations were dependent on US involvement — and highlighted the lack of precision weapons in European armories. Some right-wing and military critics in the US also blamed the alliance's agreement-by-consensus arrangements for hobbling and slowing down the campaign.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War

Posted at 10:25 am by Psychomike
Make a comment

Next Page